Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Toledo Community Foundation Inc Algonquin Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Education$59kHuman Services$51kFood & Nutrition$13kCommunity Improvement$11kEnvironment$11kArts & Culture$8kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$5kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$68k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,251
Median grant
1
States reached
$492k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO$6,367
READ FOR LITERACY INC$5,090
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO - NORTHWEST OHIO REGION$4,251
SOLAR TOLEDO NEIGHBORHOOD FOUNDATION$1,697
PERRYSBURG HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION$1,697
CONNECTING KIDS TO MEALS INC$858
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO: $20k → 18%ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO: $8k → 18%ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO: $8k → 18%ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO: $6k → 18%ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO: $5k → 18%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF AMERICA INC CO ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO: $3k → 18%BEACH HOUSE INC DBA LEADING FAMILIES HOME: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$196k · 11 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$196k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+37%

Still filing today

82%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO
    6× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +43%
  • RF
    READ FOR LITERACY INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +5%
  • PH
    PERRYSBURG HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $11k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • TS
    TOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +26%
  • PF
    PARTNERS FOR CLEAN STREAMSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +229%
  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Toledo Day Nursery

To provide children of working and student parents with quality, affordable childcare programs devoted to enhancing the child's educational, social, emotional, and physical development. to provide also the parent with the childcare…

Human Services
2
The Toledo Legal Aid Society

Toledo Legal Aid Society provides legal representation for indigent clients that are charged with criminal, traffic, or juvenile offenses for which the penalty or any possible adjudication includes the potential loss of liberty.

3
Toledo Science Center

Empower everyone to explore the sciences through interactive exhibits and educational programming.

Arts & Culture
4
The Toledo Bar Association

Provide outstanding service to our members and to assist them in serving the legal profession and the community.

5
Toledo Regional Chamber of Commerce

To solve critical business challenges in order to create vibrant economic opportunities for all in our region.

6
Toledo Early Learning Coalition Incorporated

To ensure that all youth ages 0-5 have access to quality early learning programs and services regardless of race sex economic status or geographical location and the ability and the support necessary to enter kindergarten ready to learn…

7
Toledo GROWs Inc

Toledo GROWs nurtures the joy of growing. Toledo GROWs educates the community about the value of local nutritious food. Our active urban farm and support for community gardens promote healthy eating and creates a region alive with gardens.

Environment
8
Leadership Toledo

Through a spectrum of programming for adults and high school students, lt offers individuals the opportunity to become more confident leaders, connect with the community, grow stronger in self-awareness, and serve in ways that are…

9
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
10
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
11
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
12
Rotary Club of Toledo

To provide support for community service work for the handicapped, the youth, and the elderly

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toledo Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Boxing Club International Boxing Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEarly Childhood and Youth E…Disability & Aging ServicesToledo Community FundersMember Social ClubsResidential Care & Support …Alternative Public Charter …Mental Health & Addiction S…Toledo Arts & Culture Organ…Toledo Regional Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr12%10%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr14%50%35–55yr20%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr12%9%5–10yr17%0%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr14%46%35–55yr20%40%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/25
the rest of the field
13%
294/2,339

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO - NORTHWEST OHIO REGION — $54,751 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO - N…ST TIMOTHY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $4,500 · OtherST TIMOTHY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHVASSAR COLLEGE — $3,000 · OtherTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · OtherTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST OHIO — $3,000 · Other+6 more — $9,000 · Other+6 moreREAD FOR LITERACY INC — $39,590 · EducationREAD FOR LITERACY INCSOLAR TOLEDO NEIGHBORHOOD FOUNDATION — $11,697 · EducationSOLAR TOLEDO NEIGHBORHOOD FOU…Learning Club of Toledo — $3,000 · EducationPARTNERS IN EDUCATION OF TOLEDO — $2,000 · Education+2 more — $3,000 · EducationTHE ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO — $48,367 · Human ServicesTHE ABILITY CENTER OF GRE…BEACH HOUSE INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesBEACH HOUSE INCCONNECTING KIDS TO MEALS INC — $5,358 · Food & NutritionTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK — $4,500 · Food & NutritionTOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC — $3,000 · Food & NutritionPERRYSBURG HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — $11,197 · Community ImprovementBLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY — $7,500 · EnvironmentPARTNERS FOR CLEAN STREAMS — $3,000 · EnvironmentTOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS COMMISSION OF GREATER TOLEDO I — $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$78,751Education$59,287Human Services$51,367Food & Nutrition$12,858Community Improvement$11,197Environment$10,500Arts & Culture$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO — $48,367 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetREAD FOR LITERACY INC — $39,590 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetSOLAR TOLEDO NEIGHBORHOOD FOUNDATION — $11,697 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPERRYSBURG HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — $11,197 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTOLEDO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCONNECTING KIDS TO MEALS INC — $5,358 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR CLEAN STREAMS — $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST OHIO — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEACH HOUSE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION OF TOLEDO — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIO — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADELANTE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARTS COMMISSION OF GREATER TOLEDO I — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTUTORSMART — $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMAUMEE VALLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBITTERSWEET INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA PROJECT INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEquitas Health Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation Inc Seneca FundOH49.7× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc Seneca Fund · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · The Stranahan Supporting Organization · Toledo Classic Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Andersons Foundation · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · Elsie and Harry Baumker Charitable Foundation Inc · Gorski Family Foundation · Walter E Terhune Memorial Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Toledo Community Foundation Inc Algonquin Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph