Skip to content

· Private foundation

Toby Wintrub Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$141kHealth$122kCivil Rights$102kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kInternational$30kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$20kEnvironment$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $79k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$668k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER WASHINGTON ED TELEC ASSOC$25,000
WOMEN'S FUND SOUTHCOAST INC$14,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FDN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HUMANITY IN ACTION$10,000
HELPING HANDS HEALTH EDUCATION$10,000
OUR SISTERS SCHOOL$6,000
BACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC$5,000
NPR$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%IMMIGRANT'S ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1k → 11%IMMIGRANT'S ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1k → 11%IMMIGRANT'S ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1k → 11%IMMIGRANT'S ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$398k · 17 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$398k
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-10%

Still filing today

76%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $72k · revenue +53%
  • CF
    Clearwater Free Clinic Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $62k · revenue +85%
  • BT
    BACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATION TELE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • TA
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
2
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
3
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
4
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
5
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
South Shore Hospital Inc

South shore hospital's primary exempt purpose is to provide health care services to the community including surgical, medical and other treatment of the sick and injured. south shore health system has an overarching mission for every…

Health
8
Northshore Health Centers Inc

The mission of northshore health centers is to provide the most comprehensive and quality healthcare, without exclusion, to everyone, every time.

Health
9
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
10
North End Community Health Committee

To operate a community health center providing a full range of health care services including medical, dental, vision, mental health and elder services to residents of the north end, charlestown and west end of boston, massachusetts.

Health
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Sisters School; the most unlike its peers is Helping Hands Health Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INC: $72,000 · OtherWOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INCSTAMFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $37,000 · OtherSTAMFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATION TELE: $25,000 · OtherGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATION TELEGREATER WASHINGTON ED TELEC ASSOC: $25,000 · OtherGREATER WASHINGTON ED TELEC ASSOCTELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOC INC: $25,000 · OtherTELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOC INCIndividual grant recipient: $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOUNTRYSIDE CARESHELPING HANDS: $15,000 · OtherHELPIN HANDS HEALTH EDUCATION: $10,000 · OtherCOLORADO UNIV CONF ON WORLD AFFAIRS: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $28,500 · Other+7 moreBACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC: $45,000 · EducationBACK TO SCHOOL SHO…OUR SISTERS SCHOOL: $35,500 · EducationOUR SISTERS SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLO…Clearwater Free Clinic Inc: $62,000 · HealthClearwater Fre…SOUTHCOAST HOSPITALS GROUP INC: $8,000 · HealthSOUTHCOAST HOS…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 · InternationalWORLD CENT…HELPING HANDS HEALTH EDUCATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalHELPING HA…HUMANITY IN ACTION INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsDARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $5,000 · EnvironmentIMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$289,000Education$90,500Health$70,000International$50,000Civil Rights$30,000Environment$12,500Human Services$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INC: $72,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetClearwater Free Clinic Inc: $62,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC: $45,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetOUR SISTERS SCHOOL: $35,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITY IN ACTION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetHELPING HANDS HEALTH EDUCATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHCOAST HOSPITALS GROUP INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSt Petersburg Free Clinic Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYouth Opportunities Unlimited Inc: $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMENS FUND SOUTHCOAST INC ↗
  • Who funds Clearwater Free Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds BACK TO SCHOOL SHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR SISTERS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANITY IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS HEALTH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHCOAST HOSPITALS GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds DARTMOUTH NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds St Petersburg Free Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANTS' ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Opportunities Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation IncMA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Alvord Family Foundation · Island Foundation Inc · The Carney Family Charitable Foundation · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Toby Wintrub Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Toby Wintrub Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
  • Southcoast Hospitals Group Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Immigrants' Assistance Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Our Sisters School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Toby Wintrub’s filings →

More from the funding graph