Skip to content

· Private foundation

Toan-O'Brien Foundation Barrett Toan & Paula O'Brien Ttees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$363k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
8
States reached
$188k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$6.6MCivil Rights$3.3MHealth$2.0MArts & Culture$840kFood & Nutrition$418kEnvironment$187kAnimals$55kHuman Services$54kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $318k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$187,500
NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS$80,000
ASHEVILLE SCHOOL$50,000
FEEDING AMERICA$10,000
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$10,000
COLLEGE BOUND$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH SANTA FE$5,000
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS$5,000
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$3,000
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY$3,000
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSTY AND MEDICINE$2,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THINK NEW MEXICO: $20k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $5k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $3k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $20k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 32 repeat orgs$382k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
20

Total granted

$13M
$380k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+24%

Still filing today

88%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KENYON COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $4.5M · revenue +23%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICO
    7× · 2017–2023 · $3.3M · revenue +165% · 85% of their budget
  • AS
    ASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AG
    A GROWING CULTURE
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +4% · 31% of their budget
  • JS
    JUNKYARD SOCIAL CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +116% · 30% of their budget
  • SN
    SOPHIE'S NEIGHBORHOOD
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
5
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
6
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
7
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
8
The Archaeological Conservancy

To acquire and preserve america's most important archaeological sites. the conservancy identifies important endangered sites, acquires the property by purchase, gift, or bargain sale from donors, secures the property, stabilizes the…

—
9
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
10
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
11
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
12
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sophie's Neighborhood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
33/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENYON COLLEGE: $4,464,750 · EducationKENYON COLLEGEASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC: $1,065,500 · EducationASHEVILLE SCHOOL INCNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE: $406,000 · EducationNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE+3 more: $27,000 · EducationAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICO: $3,337,500 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICOThe New City School Inc: $1,015,000 · OtherThe New City School IncPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1,000,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD+30 more: $397,900 · Other+30 moreROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $755,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $150,000 · HealthSOPHIE'S NEIGHBORHOOD: $50,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthSITE SANTA FE: $203,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE WRIGHT OPERA HOUSE INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureJUNKYARD SOCIAL CLUB: $100,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $4,250 · Arts & CultureTHE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $175,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $72,000 · Food & NutritionTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $117,500 · Animals+2 more: $1,100 · AnimalsTHINK NEW MEXICO: $53,500 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT: $21,000 · Human Services
Education$5,963,250Other$5,750,400Health$957,500Arts & Culture$417,250Food & Nutrition$247,000Animals$118,600Human Services$74,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENYON COLLEGE: $4,464,750 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICO: $3,337,500 over 7y, 85% of budgetASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC: $1,065,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetThe New City School Inc: $1,015,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $755,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE: $406,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetSITE SANTA FE: $203,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetTHE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE: $175,000 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA GROWING CULTURE: $150,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $117,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WRIGHT OPERA HOUSE INC: $110,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetJUNKYARD SOCIAL CLUB: $100,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetFeeding America: $72,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO: $53,500 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetA MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND: $50,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSOPHIE'S NEIGHBORHOOD: $50,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetSANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY NEWS: $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLUE BENCH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGWAY CHAUTAUQUA DBA THE NEW SHERBINO THEATER: $2,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEZUMA LAND CONSERVANCY: $1,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmigos Bravos Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CHANCE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR LAND RESTORATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENYON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds The New City School Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SITE SANTA FE ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSCIOUS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds A GROWING CULTURE ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WRIGHT OPERA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNKYARD SOCIAL CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds THINK NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds A MILLION STARS INC DBA COLLEGE BOUND ↗
  • Who funds SOPHIE'S NEIGHBORHOOD ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds WILDEARTH GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BLUE BENCH ↗
  • Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RIDGWAY CHAUTAUQUA DBA THE NEW SHERBINO THEATER ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thornburg FoundationNM19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thornburg Foundation · Gale Family Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Abeles Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Klein Foundation · The Sulica Fund Inc · Bolene Charitable Trust · Carl & Marilynn Thoma Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Toan-O'Brien Foundation Barrett Toan & Paula O'Brien Ttees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Toan-O'Brien Foundation Barrett Toan & Paula O'Brien Ttees. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • St John's College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Toan-O'Brien Foundation Barrett Toan & Paula O'Brien Ttees?

Find your warmest path to Toan-O'Brien Foundation Barrett Toan & Paula O'Brien Ttees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Toan-O'Brien Foundation Barrett Toan & Paula O'Brien Ttees’ filings →

More from the funding graph