Skip to content
Tina de Boer Long Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Tina de Boer Long Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$127k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Social Science$481kAnimals$149kEnvironment$60kYouth Development$52kPhilanthropy$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kArts & Culture$14kEducation$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PANETTA INSTITUTE$56,000
NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION$15,000
ANIMAL 24-7$10,000
ANIMAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSOCIATES$5,000
MONTEREY FIREFIGHTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO$5,000
MONTEREY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$5,000
PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE$5,000
THE BIG FIX UGANDA COMFORT DOG PROJECT$5,000
ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT$5,000
CARMEL GALLERY ALLIANCE FBO CARMEL ART$5,000
JOHN BURTON ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH$5,000
BIRCHBARK FOUNDATION INC$5,000
HONOLULU CIVIL BEAT INC$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $5k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
CT
CA
MD
SC
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$757k · 18 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
19

Total granted

$757k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

78%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +66%
  • AH
    ANIMAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSOCIATES
    5× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +30%
  • HW
    HORSERACING WRONGS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • SS
    Sabu Shake Sr Memorial Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0% · 26% of their budget
  • S
    SHARK
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TA
    The American Himalayan Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
2
Mendocino Coast Humane Society

Caring for homeless animals, and finding homes for them through pet adoptions.

Animals
3
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
4
Rancho Coastal Humane Society

See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…

Animals
5
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
6
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
7
High Sierra Animal Rescue Inc

High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…

Animals
8
Humane Society of the Sierra Foothills

To prevent animal abuse and neglect, enforce the anti-cruelty laws of the State of California and promote the wellbeing of animals.

Animals
9
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
10
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
11
Jameson Animal Rescue Ranch

Jameson humane is an impact-driven nonprofit organization whose program model includes a variety of novel solutions and approaches to create a truly unique animal welfare organization that is unlike any animal rescue or sanctuary. jameson…

Animals
12
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Marine Sanctuary Foundation; the most unlike its peers is International Primate Protection League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
15/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PANETTA INSTITUTE: $481,000 · OtherTHE PANETTA INSTITUTE+18 more: $56,650 · Other+18 moreANIMAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSOCIATES: $37,000 · AnimalsANIMAL HEALTH AND …HORSERACING WRONGS INC: $30,000 · AnimalsHORSERACING WRONGS…ANIMALS 24-7: $27,500 · AnimalsANIMALS 24-7MONTEREY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · AnimalsMONTEREY ZOOLOGICA…PEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $8,325 · AnimalsPEACE OF MIND DOG …BIRCHBARK FOUNDATION INC: $7,667 · AnimalsBIRCHBARK FOUNDATI…INTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $6,000 · Animals+3 more: $4,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION: $59,500 · EnvironmentJohn Burton Advocates for Youth: $26,000 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO CIELO INC: $24,700 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $10,000 · PhilanthropySabu Shake Sr Memorial Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMONTEREY FIREFIGHTERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,525 · Public Safety & DisasterARTS COUNCIL FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $7,000 · Arts & CultureYOUTH ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureHonolulu Civil Beat Inc: $900 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$537,650Animals$131,492Environment$59,500Youth Development$51,700Philanthropy$20,000Public Safety & Disaster$15,525Arts & Culture$9,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION: $59,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSOCIATES: $37,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetHORSERACING WRONGS INC: $30,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetANIMALS 24-7: $27,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetJohn Burton Advocates for Youth: $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $24,700 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMONTEREY FIREFIGHTERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,525 over 2y, 12% of budgetMONTEREY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSabu Shake Sr Memorial Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetPEACE OF MIND DOG RESCUE: $8,325 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIRCHBARK FOUNDATION INC: $7,667 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARTS COUNCIL FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAnimal Friends Rescue Project: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Himalayan Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAX'S HELPING PAWS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFlying Fur Animal Rescue: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVENTANA WILDLIFE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHonolulu Civil Beat Inc: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIM Youth Mental Health: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HORSES & KIDS: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNSET CULTURAL CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula Fo…Barnet Segal Charitab…Pebble Beach Company …Dunspaugh Dalton Foun…S&P Global Foundation…The David and Lucile …Marin Community Found…The Talbott Family Fo…Giancola Family Found…Nancy Buck Ransom Fou…Doris Day Animal Foun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Barnet Segal Charitable Trust · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Talbott Family Foundation · Giancola Family Foundation · Nancy Buck Ransom Foundation · Doris Day Animal Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tina de Boer Long Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tina de Boer Long Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • National Marine Sanctuary Foundation: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tina de Boer Long’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home