Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Timothy L Slattery Sr and Thelma H Slattery Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$208kAnimals$53kHousing & Shelter$50kReligion$16kFood & Nutrition$13kPhilanthropy$10kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$291k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN URBAN EDUCATION SERVICE$20,000
SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE$2,130
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%PGA REACH NEBRASKA: $600 → 13%MATTERS ON TOMORROW: $1k → 13%MATTERS ON TOMORROW: $600 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$294k · 15 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$294k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-4%

Still filing today

60%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHousing & ShelterReligionHuman ServicesHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +31%
  • SC
    STEPHEN CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $42k · revenue +37%
  • NH
    NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • OH
    OMAHA HENRY DOORLY ZOO
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • JA
    JESUIT ACADEMY OF OMAHA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • MF
    MATER FILIUS OF NEBRASKA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
2
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

3
Nebraska Medicine

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and committees through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
4
Nebraska State Historical Society Foundation

The nebraska state historical society foundation's mission is to support the preservation, interpretation and appreciation of nebraska history.

Arts & Culture
5
Nebraska Pediatric Practice Inc

Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…

Health
6
University Enterprise Laboratories Inc

The mission of the university enterprise laboratories is to support early-stage ventures in life sciences to growth and commercial success through connections, services, and world-class laboratory facilities in minnesota's entrepreneurship…

Science & Tech
7
Blueprint Nebraska

Conduct scientific research to formulate a comprehensive research report and action plan that offers a clear path towards sustained economic prosperity for all of the people in the state of nebraska.

8
Nebraska Coalition for Patient Safety

Improve healthcare by collecting, analyzing, and sharing information about patient safety; and to ensure compliance with the patient safety improvement act.

Public Benefit
9
Unf Charitable Gift Fund

The unf charitable gift fund was established to enable donors to make charitable donations to multiple organizations, including the university of nebraska.

Philanthropy
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

11
Nebraska Organ Recovery System

We transform lives through organ and tissue donation.

Health
12
Northland Foundation

The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Lori Peterson Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CREIGHTON PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $26,500 · OtherCREIGHTON PREPARATORY SCHOOLOMAHA HENRY DOORLY ZOO — $25,000 · OtherOMAHA HENRY DOORLY ZOOJESUIT ACADEMY OF OMAHA — $10,000 · OtherJESUIT ACADEMY OF OMAHAST PHILIP NERI — $6,600 · OtherST PHILIP NERISERVANTS OF MARY — $5,500 · OtherABLAZE MINISTRY CO ST GERALD CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherMARIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $4,400 · OtherTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $10,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE+15 more — $30,500 · Other+15 moreUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDAT…CUES FUND — $51,754 · ReligionCUES FUND+1 more — $1,000 · ReligionSTEPHEN CENTER INC — $42,050 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENTER…SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $4,630 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS …GESU HOUSING INC — $3,000 · Housing & ShelterGESU HOUSING I…NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $15,000 · AnimalsNEBRASKA WILDLIFE REHAB INC — $10,000 · AnimalsTown and Country Humane Society — $2,000 · AnimalsHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $13,250 · Food & NutritionMATER FILIUS OF NEBRASKA INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$123,500Education$100,000Religion$52,754Housing & Shelter$49,680Animals$27,000Food & Nutrition$13,250Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCUES FUND — $51,754 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC — $42,050 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER — $13,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMATER FILIUS OF NEBRASKA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA WILDLIFE REHAB INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE — $4,630 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION — $3,100 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGESU HOUSING INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTown and Country Humane Society — $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMATTERS ON TOMORROW — $1,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLord Teach Me to Pray — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLORI PETERSON CANCER FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CUES FUND
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER
  • Who funds MATER FILIUS OF NEBRASKA INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE
  • Who funds NEBRASKA WILDLIFE REHAB INC
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
  • Who funds NEBRASKA PGA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GESU HOUSING INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds Town and Country Humane Society
  • Who funds MATTERS ON TOMORROW
  • Who funds Lord Teach Me to Pray
  • Who funds LORI PETERSON CANCER FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Greater Horizons · The Soener Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Timothy L Slattery Sr and Thelma H Slattery Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph