Skip to content

· Private foundation

Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$129k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$348kAnimals$132kArts & Culture$78kReligion$56kHuman Services$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kFood & Nutrition$8kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION OF FMCC$50,000
MULE DEER FOUNDATION$20,000
DOUBLE H RANCH$20,000
HFM PREVENTION COUNCIL$10,000
WYOMING WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$10,000
MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE$7,500
FAMILY COUNCILING CENTER$7,500
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,500
ADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE$1,000
LAWRENCE MADEIROS SCHOLARSHIP$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE LEXINGTON FOUNDATION: $200 → 13%LEXINGTON FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%LEXINGTON FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%LEXINGTON FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
MA
WY
OH
PA
UT
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 17 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
23

Total granted

$488k
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+33%

Still filing today

35%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsArts & CultureEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NL
    NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +9%
  • MD
    MULE DEER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +65%
  • CA
    CAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • SC
    SUBLETTE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue ×15 · 81% of their budget
  • FC
    FULTON COUNTY REGIONAL SPCA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -28%
  • SS
    SHARON SPRINGS SHARING AND CARING
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adirondack Medical Center Foundation

To support and assist adirondack medical center, an exempt healthcare organization.

Philanthropy
2
Wilderness Health Care Foundation Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively to provide funds to or for the benefit of clifton-fine hospital.

—
3
Windsor Hospital Corporation

Mt. ascutney hospital and health center's mission is to improve the lives of those we serve.

Health
4
Southwestern Vermont Healthcare Foundation Inc

The sole purpose of the svhc foundation shall be to engage in development and fundraising activities exclusively for the support of the southwestern vermont health care corporation and affiliates.

Health
5
Adirondack Mountain Club Inc

Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…

Environment
6
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
7
Long Island Medical Foundation Inc Dba Nuhealth Foundation

Long island medical foundation (limf) is the not-for-profit philanthropic arm of the nassau health care corporation. limf is devoted to inspire philanthropic support for the nassau university medical center, a. holly patterson skilled…

Health
8
The Foundation of Monongalia General Hospital

The foundation raises funds for monongalia county general hospital and its affiliated entities.

Health
9
The New London Hospital Association Inc

The mission of the New London Hospital Association is To continually improve the wellbeing of individuals in our region by providing high-quality healthcare to our communities.

Health
10
Williamstown Rural Lands Foundation

To preserve the rural new england character of williamstown, ma and surrounding areas for future generations; enable working landscapes including farms and forests; promote land stewardship.

Environment
11
Lake George Land Conservancy Inc

Dedicated to permanently preserve the natural, scenic and recreational resources of the Lake George Basin.

Environment
12
Southwestern Vermont Health Care Corporation

To care for and comfort our patients, residents, and their loved ones and to improve the health status of the communities we serve. the purpose of the organization is also to promote and support the development and maintenance of a highly…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Double H Hole in the Woods Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Meco Volunteer Fire Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE: $99,900 · OtherMOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICEFOUNDATION OF FMCC: $50,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF FMCCROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION: $43,500 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATIONWYOMING WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $33,500 · OtherWYOMING WILDLIFE FOUNDATIONADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE-MUSEUM: $27,989 · OtherADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE-MUSEUMMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $17,000 · OtherMAYFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16,000 · OtherSHARON SPRINGS SHARING AND CARING: $15,400 · Other+22 more: $73,403 · Other+22 moreNATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · HealthNATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL ASSO…SUBLETTE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthSUBLETTE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDA…ALCOHOLISM & SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL OF HFM COUNTIES INC: $10,000 · HealthALCOHOLISM & SUBSTANCE ABUSE …+3 more: $2,600 · HealthFULTON COUNTY REGIONAL SPCA INC: $30,000 · AnimalsMULE DEER FOUNDATION: $25,000 · AnimalsDOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $200 · Recreation & SportsCAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureADIRONDACK HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $12,900 · Arts & CultureLEXINGTON FOUNDATION INC: $5,700 · Human ServicesWYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$376,692Health$182,600Animals$55,000Recreation & Sports$50,200Arts & Culture$32,900Human Services$5,700Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUBLETTE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 1y, 81% of budgetDOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFULTON COUNTY REGIONAL SPCA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetMULE DEER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetADIRONDACK HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $12,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALCOHOLISM & SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL OF HFM COUNTIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLions of Wyoming Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLEXINGTON FOUNDATION INC: $5,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATHAN LITTAUER FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWake Up Narcolepsy Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMECO VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetECCENTRIC CLUB OF GLOVERSVILLE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SUBLETTE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FULTON COUNTY REGIONAL SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds MULE DEER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALCOHOLISM & SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL OF HFM COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Lions of Wyoming Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds NATHAN LITTAUER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE MADEIROS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Wake Up Narcolepsy Inc ↗
  • Who funds MECO VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds ECCENTRIC CLUB OF GLOVERSVILLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Timothy & Tina Delaney Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph