· Private foundation
Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of TIMOTHY & TINA DELANEY FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION OF FMCC | $50,000 |
| DOUBLE H RANCH | $20,000 |
| MULE DEER FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| WYOMING WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HFM PREVENTION COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| FAMILY COUNCILING CENTER | $7,500 |
| MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE | $7,500 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| ADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE | $1,000 |
| LAWRENCE MADEIROS SCHOLARSHIP | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NLNATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +9%
- MDMULE DEER FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +65%
- CACAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- SCSUBLETTE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue ×15 · 81% of their budget
- FCFULTON COUNTY REGIONAL SPCA INCone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -28%
- SSSHARON SPRINGS SHARING AND CARINGone grant, 2022 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support and assist adirondack medical center, an exempt healthcare organization.
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively to provide funds to or for the benefit of clifton-fine hospital.
Mt. ascutney hospital and health center's mission is to improve the lives of those we serve.
The sole purpose of the svhc foundation shall be to engage in development and fundraising activities exclusively for the support of the southwestern vermont health care corporation and affiliates.
Adk is the only non-profit organization in new york state dedicated to the conservation, preservation, and responsible recreational use of the new york state forest preserve and other parks, wild lands, and waters vital to our members and…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
Long island medical foundation (limf) is the not-for-profit philanthropic arm of the nassau health care corporation. limf is devoted to inspire philanthropic support for the nassau university medical center, a. holly patterson skilled…
The foundation raises funds for monongalia county general hospital and its affiliated entities.
The mission of the New London Hospital Association is To continually improve the wellbeing of individuals in our region by providing high-quality healthcare to our communities.
To preserve the rural new england character of williamstown, ma and surrounding areas for future generations; enable working landscapes including farms and forests; promote land stewardship.
Dedicated to permanently preserve the natural, scenic and recreational resources of the Lake George Basin.
To care for and comfort our patients, residents, and their loved ones and to improve the health status of the communities we serve. the purpose of the organization is also to promote and support the development and maintenance of a highly…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Double H Hole in the Woods Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meco Volunteer Fire Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATHAN LITTAUER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SUBLETTE COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds FULTON COUNTY REGIONAL SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds MULE DEER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Lions of Wyoming Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALCOHOLISM & SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUNCIL OF HFM COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds NATHAN LITTAUER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE MADEIROS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Wake Up Narcolepsy Inc ↗
- Who funds MECO VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds ECCENTRIC CLUB OF GLOVERSVILLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Timothy & Tina Delaney Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.