Skip to content
Tim Case International Ministries Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Tim Case International Ministries Inc

MINISTRY, EDUCATION & DONATION OF UNIFORMS, SUPPLIES, AND FOOD TO STUDENTS IN UGANDA AND SUPPORT OF MISSIONARY IN BELIZE.

$853k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$613k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MHuman Services$831kInternational$192kArts & Culture$70kEducation$61k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $138k
  • $250k+1 grant · $613k
$39,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$163k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD MISSIONS$612,500
SPARROWS NEST$83,500
BAKER FAMILY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$54,660
LUKET MINISTRIES$39,000
LRC MINISTRIES$33,000
OMNIPEACE FOUNDATION$20,000
M-REE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $791k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SPARROWS NEST: $213k → 15%SPARROWS NEST: $188k → 15%SPARROWS NEST: $84k → 15%SPARROWS NEST: $75k → 15%SPARROWS NEST: $70k → 15%SPARROWS NEST: $65k → 15%SPARROWS NEST: $60k → 15%SPARROWS NEST: $38k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of Tim Case International Ministries Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 60%.

Tim Case International Ministries Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 12 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$2.6M
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+20%

Still filing today

42%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    POWER OF A NICKEL INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $83k · revenue +10%
  • LM
    LUKET MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +73% · 35% of their budget
  • OF
    OMNIPEACE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $70k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • HT
    HARVEST TIME ASSEMBLY CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • IH
    IN HIS IMAGE INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD MISSIONS: $1,246,500 · OtherWORLD MISSIONSNEW DAY CHURCH: $108,800 · OtherNEW DAY CHURCHLRC MINISTRIES: $77,000 · OtherBAKER FAMILY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $58,660 · Other+8 more: $119,500 · Other+8 moreSPARROW'S NEST INC: $790,500 · Human ServicesSPARROW'S NEST INCPOWER OF A NICKEL INC: $82,500 · HealthMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthLUKET MINISTRIES INC: $71,500 · InternationalOMNIPEACE FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureIN HIS IMAGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · EducationHEARTFIRE MISSIONS INC: $17,500 · Religion
Other$1,610,460Human Services$790,500Health$122,500International$71,500Arts & Culture$70,000Education$20,000Religion$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPARROW'S NEST INC: $790,500 over 8y, 47% of budgetPOWER OF A NICKEL INC: $82,500 over 5y, 23% of budgetLUKET MINISTRIES INC: $71,500 over 6y, 35% of budgetOMNIPEACE FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIN HIS IMAGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEARTFIRE MISSIONS INC: $17,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPARROW'S NEST INC ↗
  • Who funds POWER OF A NICKEL INC ↗
  • Who funds LUKET MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds OMNIPEACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IN HIS IMAGE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTFIRE MISSIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tim Case International Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tim Case International Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tim Case International Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home