Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tim and Dana Bacich Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$96kHuman Services$83kEducation$73kEmployment$25kReligion$17kPhilanthropy$9kRecreation & Sports$8kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
$1,756
Median grant
6
States reached
$247k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$41,950
SSM HEALTH CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$12,550
CHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORY$11,250
WOMANS EXCHANGE OF ST LOUIS$9,010
CARIDNAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$5,600
STRAY RESCUE OF ST LOUIS$5,000
CHARITY FUNDRAISING US$3,750
AUTISM SPEAKS$2,800
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,756
ST GENEVIEVE DU BOIS$1,600
THE KATIE CENTORBI FOUNDATION$1,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION$1,000
PEDAL THE CAUSE$1,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCES SERVICES$500
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE ASSOCATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $500 → 11%ST MARTHA'S HALL: $5k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
PA
UT
MO
VA
MD
TN
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$282k · 18 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
29

Total granted

$282k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+26%

Still filing today

61%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEmploymentInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +72%
  • SC
    SSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +2%
  • TW
    THE WOMAN'S EXCHANGE OF ST LOUIS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • AO
    ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS GAMERS BASEBALL
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • KS
    KELLEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS - FAMILY LEADERSHIP FUND (INDIANA UNIVERSITY)
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc

St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…

Health
3
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
4
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
5
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
9
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
11
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
12
Ssm-Sluh Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $75,150 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSECHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $60,530 · OtherCHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORYCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $46,624 · OtherCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONST GENEVIEVE DU BOIS: $8,750 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS: $8,370 · Other+32 more: $48,421 · Other+32 moreSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $27,550 · HealthSSM CARDINA…AUTISM SPEAKS INC: $3,050 · HealthAUTISM SPEA…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,250 · Health+3 more: $1,350 · HealthTHE WOMAN'S EXCHANGE OF ST LOUIS: $24,039 · EmploymentREADY READERS: $4,570 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $2,500 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationWORLD PEDIATRICS: $7,556 · InternationalST MARTHA'S HALL: $5,000 · Human ServicesPEDAL THE CAUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $500 · Human ServicesStray Rescue of St Louis: $5,100 · Animals
Other$247,845Health$33,200Employment$24,039Education$9,820International$7,556Human Services$6,500Animals$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $46,624 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $27,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMAN'S EXCHANGE OF ST LOUIS: $24,039 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD PEDIATRICS: $7,556 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetStray Rescue of St Louis: $5,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARTHA'S HALL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREADY READERS: $4,570 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $3,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED ATHLETE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMAN'S EXCHANGE OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD PEDIATRICS ↗
  • Who funds Stray Rescue of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds ST MARTHA'S HALL ↗
  • Who funds READY READERS ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED ATHLETE SPORTS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community FoundationMO15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Edward Jones Foundation · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tim and Dana Bacich Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tim and Dana Bacich Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tim and Dana Bacich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph