· Private foundation
Tim and Dana Bacich Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $41,950 |
| SSM HEALTH CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $12,550 |
| CHAMINADE COLLEGE PREPARATORY | $11,250 |
| WOMANS EXCHANGE OF ST LOUIS | $9,010 |
| CARIDNAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $5,600 |
| STRAY RESCUE OF ST LOUIS | $5,000 |
| CHARITY FUNDRAISING US | $3,750 |
| AUTISM SPEAKS | $2,800 |
| ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $1,756 |
| ST GENEVIEVE DU BOIS | $1,600 |
| THE KATIE CENTORBI FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| PEDAL THE CAUSE | $1,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| COMMUNITY RESOURCES SERVICES | $500 |
| SITEMAN CANCER CENTER | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CGCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +72%
- SCSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +2%
- TWTHE WOMAN'S EXCHANGE OF ST LOUIS5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- AOARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUISone grant, 2021 · $7k
- SLST LOUIS GAMERS BASEBALLone grant, 2021 · $6k
- MFMATTINGLY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…
To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…
See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…
Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE WOMAN'S EXCHANGE OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds WORLD PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds Stray Rescue of St Louis ↗
- Who funds ST MARTHA'S HALL ↗
- Who funds READY READERS ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
- Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER ↗
- Who funds DISABLED ATHLETE SPORTS ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Edward Jones Foundation · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tim and Dana Bacich Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.