Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tim Allen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$397k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$1.3MHuman Services$458kEducation$361kHealth$181kCommunity Improvement$150kArts & Culture$72kFood & Nutrition$68kEmployment$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $225k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDNIGHT MISSION$75,000
CAMPBELL HALL$50,000
CAMPBELL HALL$50,000
MIDNIGHT MISSION$50,000
FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD$37,000
SAY DETROIT$30,000
SALVATION ARMY$25,000
HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION$25,000
SALVATION ARMY$25,000
BAY COMMUNITY THEATRE$15,000
SAG FOUNDATION$10,000
VILLAGE OF NORTHPORT FIREWORKS$2,500
RAPE FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $50k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $44k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $40k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $37k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $20k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $15k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $10k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $10k → 8%FATHER KEN'S VINEYARD: $200 → 8%HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 14%HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $129k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $125k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $125k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $110k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $100k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $100k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $75k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $75k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $50k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $40k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $25k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $25k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 18 repeat orgs$503k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$2.3M
$503k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+25%

Still filing today

44%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MIDNIGHT MISSION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $999k · revenue +43%
  • FK
    Father Kens Vineyard Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $226k · revenue +159%
  • SD
    SAY DETROIT
    5× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOPE OF THE VALLEY
    one grant, 2021 · $129k
  • SF
    SAN FERNANDO VALLEY RESCUEBMISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
  • ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hollywood Foreign Press Association Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
2
The Miracle Theater Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Los Angeles International Dance Festival
—
6
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
7
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Downtown Women's Center

Housing, employment, and physical and mental health services for women overcoming homelessness and poverty.

Human Services
9
David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness -Based Education and World Peace

The david lynch foundation for consciousness-based education and world peace (the "foundation or "dlf") is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 2005. the foundation helps to prevent and eradicate the epidemic of trauma and toxic…

Philanthropy
10
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Regional Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is The Inkwell Theater Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $999,375 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSIONFather Kens Vineyard Inc: $226,200 · Human ServicesFather Kens Vineyard IncHOPE THE MISSION: $50,000 · Human ServicesCAMPBELL HALL -EPISCOPAL-: $361,000 · OtherCAMPBELL HALL -EPISCOPAL-SALVATION ARMY: $202,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYHOPE OF THE VALLEY: $129,375 · OtherHOPE OF THE VALLEYSAN FERNANDO VALLEY RESCUEBMISSION: $125,000 · OtherSAN FERNANDO VALLEY RESCUEBMISSIONELTON JOHN AIDS FOUDNATION: $67,000 · OtherELTON JOHN AIDS FOUDNATIONSAG FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherST FRANCIS DE SALES: $50,000 · Other+18 more: $225,950 · Other+18 moreSAY DETROIT: $150,000 · Housing & ShelterELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · HealthGLOBAL MOBILITY: $39,750 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $27,000 · HealthGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · International
Human Services$1,275,575Other$1,225,325Housing & Shelter$150,000Health$121,750Philanthropy$30,000Food & Nutrition$25,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $999,375 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetFather Kens Vineyard Inc: $226,200 over 7y, 17% of budgetSAY DETROIT: $150,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL MOBILITY: $39,750 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMEDY GIVES BACK: $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetENRICHMENT WORKS: $5,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetThe Inkwell Theater Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Father Kens Vineyard Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAY DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds ELTON JOHN AIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL MOBILITY ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds FISHTOWN PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMEDY GIVES BACK ↗
  • Who funds ENRICHMENT WORKS ↗
  • Who funds The Inkwell Theater Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tim Allen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tim Allen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tim Allen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph