Skip to content

· Public charity

Tilth Alliance

Our mission is to build an ecologically sound, economically viable, and socially equitable food system.

$579k
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.5MHuman Services$28kCommunity Improvement$10kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 58 grants below total $549,174, the rows itemized in this filing. The $579,461 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,287 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $230k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $319k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUSTAVSEN & CO LLC$29,265
WILLOW BROOK FARM$10,000
LOVGREN DAIRY$10,000
NORTH STAR FARM$10,000
FLAT TACK FARM$10,000
EMPYREAN FARM$10,000
ELK MEADOWS FARM$10,000
CROZIER FARM & ORCHARD$10,000
VASHON PEONY CO$10,000
YANG FARM$10,000
FOUNDATION FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNIT$10,000
HILLCREST FARM$10,000
RABBIT FIELDS FARM$10,000
OLA AINA FARMS$10,000
FLAMES VOICE OF HOPE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Champlains on the Harbor: $10k → 18%GROWING VETERANS: $10k → 12%South King County Food Coalit: $10k → 9%UTOPIA WASHINGTON FA'ATOAGA: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 7 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
83

Total granted

$158k
$950k

Still filing today

0%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $490k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GUSTAVSEN & CO LLC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $53k
  • FT
    Flat Tack Farm LLC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $20k
  • FF
    Farias Farm
    2× · 2020–2022 · $20k

Funded once

  • VF
    VIVA FARMSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $81k · revenue +177%
  • ST
    SnoValley Tilth
    one grant, 2019 · $62k · revenue -66%
  • DF
    D&D Farm
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Growers
—
2
South Whidbey Tilth Association

Educate about,support, and promote biologically sound and socially equitable agriculture

Food & Nutrition
3
Clatskanie Farmer Collective Inc

Clatskanie Farmer Collective cultivates a resilient local agricultural system by increasing market opportunities, community engagement, and producer support.

Education
4
Common Good City Farm

Common Good City Farm is an urban farm in Washington, DC, where community members source fresh food, see sustainable urban agriculture in action, and learn healthy skills. Our mission is to sustain and support a more equitable community…

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Forest Collective

Community Grows Here. We cultivate a community dedicated to building equitable food systems for all people, and steward our environment for the benefit of all species. We believe in Caring for the Earth. We steward our local ecosystem by…

Food & Nutrition
6
Farmville Community Garden
Food & Nutrition
7
Outgrowing Hunger

We nurture connections between people,nature,and food by ensuring access to garden space and farmland, and providing education and mentoring on regenerative and sustainable agricultural practices.

Food & Nutrition
8
Seed Peace

To grow the local food supply by supporting farmers, preparing food plants for climate change and increasing health giving food availability for people in need

—
9
The Haiku Aina Permaculture Initiative
—
10
Friends of the Farms

The mission of friends of the farms is to ensure the future of local farming and build a healthier community through a resilient and equitable food ecosystem.through our programming, services, and community engagement we support local…

Environment
11
Farmily

Farmily cultivates connection resilience and wellness by teaching youth and communities to grow food nurture nature and care for themselves and each other through hands-on garden education. Farmilys core activites are teaching organic…

Human Services
12
Common Roots Inc

Common Roots provides food education, food access and organic farming programs.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South King County Food Coalition Skcfc; the most unlike its peers is Wakulima Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUSTAVSEN & CO LLC: $52,815 · Other+133 more: $1,326,257 · Other+133 moreVIVA FARMS: $81,348 · Food & NutritionVIVA FARMSSnoValley Tilth: $61,925 · Food & NutritionSnoValley …WAKULIMA USA: $7,280 · Food & NutritionSOUTH KING COUNTY FOOD COALITION SKCFC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHAPLAINS ON THE HARBOR: $10,000 · Human ServicesGROWING VETERANS: $9,917 · Human ServicesSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $10,000 · EducationClassroom in Bloom: $10,000 · EducationORGANIC FARM SCHOOL: $8,138 · EducationFoundation for Sustainable Community: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,379,072Food & Nutrition$150,553Human Services$39,917Education$28,138Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIVA FARMS: $81,348 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH KING COUNTY FOOD COALITION SKCFC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetClassroom in Bloom: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetUNITED TERRITORIES OF PACIFIC ISLANDERS WASHINGTON-UTOPIA WA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation for Sustainable Community: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAPLAINS ON THE HARBOR: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGROWING VETERANS: $9,917 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetORGANIC FARM SCHOOL: $8,138 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWAKULIMA USA: $7,280 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIVA FARMS ↗
  • Who funds SnoValley Tilth ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH KING COUNTY FOOD COALITION SKCFC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Neighborhood Farmers Market AllianceWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Neighborhood Farmers Market Alliance · Clif Family Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Ndc Housing & Economic Development Corporation - Group Return · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tilth Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tilth Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 145 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tilth Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph