· Private foundation
Tikkun Inc %Barbara Annan
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of TIKKUN INC %BARBARA ANNAN’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k5 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $153k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHABAD OF JEWISH CENTER OF SOUTH DAKOTA | $51,800 |
| CONGREGATION OR HATZAFON | $51,036 |
| THE SYNAGOGUE OF THE HILLS | $50,000 |
| STALEY MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| SOUTH DAKOTA MINES CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS AND ADVANCEMENT | $25,000 |
| THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $10,000 |
| BLACK HILLS RAPTOR CENTER | $5,000 |
| CG JUNG FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| GREAT PLAINS BOTANIC GARDEN | $300 |
| ST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL | $72 |
| VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS | $15 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IWIDEA WILD INC2× · 2019–2021 · $24k · revenue +15%
- BHBLACK HILLS RAPTOR CENTER4× · 2019–2022 · $7k · revenue +39%
- AIAFS INTERCULTURAL PROGRAMS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- AJALASKA JEWISH MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTERone grant, 2017 · $10k
- JKJilkaat Kwaan Heritage Centerone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -7%
- YJYOUNG JEWISH PROFESSIONALSone grant, 2017 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
The Museum of the Aleutians shall collect, preserve, and share the rich cultural legacy of the Aleutian Islands Region.
Connecting people to the American West.
The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."
The mission of crazy horse memorial foundation is to protect and preserve the cultures, traditions, and living heritage of the north american indians. crazy horse memorial remains committed to the promise sculptor korczak ziolkowski made…
To provide education and instruction in the scholarly study and preservation of indian art to empower creativity and leadership in native arts and cultures through higher education, life-long learning and outreach.
Promotion of scholarly research on and in iraq and ancient mesopotamia. taarii raises funds for graduate and post-graduate fellowships for americans and for iraqi academics to perform research work on iraq in a broad range of disciplines.
See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
Museum/educational center
The mission is to honor, empower and inspire anishinaabe and dakota through immersive exhibitions, dynamic public programs and transformative education. we will ignite awareness, foster respect, and drive meaningful change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College of the Menominee Nation and the most unlike its peers is The Staley Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds THE STALEY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds IDEA WILD INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds BLACK HILLS RAPTOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds Jilkaat Kwaan Heritage Center ↗
- Who funds AFS INTERCULTURAL PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds CHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST PEOPLES FUND ↗
- Who funds American Center for Mongolian Studies ↗
- Who funds Clearwater Camp Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE MENOMINEE NATION ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Four Winds American Indian Council ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tikkun Inc %Barbara Annan funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.