Skip to content

· Private foundation

TIH Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2019
7
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$18k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of TIH Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The New Horizons Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year TIH Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $51k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
5
’18
6
’19
5
’20
5
’21
5
’22
4
’23
7
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$394kArts & Culture$126kEducation$104kReligion$92kInternational$40kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2019 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$4,400
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Commission to Every Nation$18,400
University of Northwestern St Paul$12,000
Hope Academy$7,500
The Navigators$4,400
Child Hope International$3,600
New Horizons Foundation Inc$3,600
Mission 98$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNIV OF MN FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%University of Northwestern St Paul: $24k → 14%THE SHACK SACKLER FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%Commission to Every Nation: $18k → 13%Mission 98: $1k → 7%NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION INC: $256k → 9%CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN ST PAUL: $15k → 14%COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $18k → 13%Mission 98: $1k → 7%New Horizons Foundation Inc: $33k → 9%HOPE ACADEMY: $20k → 11%University of Northwestern St Paul: $12k → 14%Commission to Every Nation: $11k → 13%Mission 98: $2k → 7%New Horizons Foundation Inc: $33k → 9%HOPE ACADEMY: $10k → 11%Commission to Every Nation: $11k → 13%New Horizons Foundation Inc: $32k → 9%Hope Academy: $8k → 11%Commission to Every Nation: $10k → 13%New Horizons Foundation Inc: $32k → 9%HOPE ACADEMY: $7k → 11%Commission to Every Nation: $9k → 13%New Horizons Foundation Inc: $4k → 9%CITY JOY: $5k → 11%COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $2k → 13%NEW HORIZONS FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 9%City Joy: $2k → 11%Global Commerce Network: $2k → 9%City Joy: $2k → 11%City Joy: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$353k · 7 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$353k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+105%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $79k · revenue +20%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL
    3× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +19%
  • HA
    HOPE ACADEMY INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +240%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +105%
  • CS
    CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · 36% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Explore God Network
—
3
Global Faith Network
Human Services
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
6
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
7
International Christian Mission Services

The mission of ICMS is to initiate, develop, and facilitate national and global christian ministries that help reduce poverty and proclaim the Christian Gospel

Religion
8
Great Commission Foundation in

Missions - sponsors foreign and domestic missions and orphanages with a special emphasis on missions in India

—
9
Joshua Nations International

Spreading christianity worldwide.

Religion
10
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
11
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
12
Harvest University

Harvest university is committed to cultivating future ministers who will take the gospel to the ends of the earth. we offer online classes to train missionaries, pastors, and others who want to make an impact for christ through other…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation; the most unlike its peers is The Shack Sackler Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The New Horizons Foundation Inc: $394,177 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc+1 more: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NAVIGATORS: $122,714 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSCITYJOY: $11,000 · OtherCITYJOYCru: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $3,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $51,450 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF N…HOPE ACADEMY INC: $44,550 · EducationHOPE ACADEMY IN…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF M…COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $79,200 · ReligionCOMMISSION T…Mission Serve Inc: $4,200 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · ReligionChild Hope International: $39,800 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$397,177Other$141,714Education$104,000Religion$85,400Arts & Culture$39,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $394,177 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $79,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $51,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC: $44,550 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetChild Hope International: $39,800 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission Serve Inc: $4,200 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetTHE SHACK SACKLER FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGLOBAL COMMERCE NETWORK: $2,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Hope International ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mission Serve Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHACK SACKLER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL COMMERCE NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization TIH Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from TIH Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to TIH Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to TIH Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on TIH’s filings →

    More from the funding graph