Skip to content
Tiferet Rose Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Tiferet Rose Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2019
30
Grants FY2019
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Housing & Shelter$33kInternational$30kReligion$6kHuman Services$4kPhilanthropy$518Education$460Animals$410Arts & Culture$336Other$0
02FY2019 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k29 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$180
Median grant
5
States reached
$442k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYIT LEPLEITOS$11,500
ZION ORPHANAGE INC$7,545
Individual grant recipient$2,860
M'EVER LAYAM$1,544
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS$1,500
JEWISH CONTENT INC$680
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$540
American Friends of Biala Yeshiva Inc$360
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$215
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JAFFA INSTITUTE$190
SAR ACADEMY$180
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$180
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE$180
JUST ONE LIFE$180
BIALA INSTITUTIONS OF AMERICA$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $398) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%FRIENDS OF YASHAR LACHAYAL INC: $200 → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $180 → 12%ZAKA SEARCH & RESCUE: $18 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 19 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$71k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+118%

Still filing today

53%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
InternationalReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZO
    ZION ORPHANAGE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $27k · revenue +43%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIALA YESHIVA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +415%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    2× · 2018–2019 · $558 · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • AF
    American Friends of CRIB Efrat Org
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT COUNCIL FOR PHILANTHROPYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +118%
  • FO
    Friends of Yashar L'Chayal Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $200 · revenue +152%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
7
Friends of Jerusalem

Friends of Jerusalem's mission is to provide assistance to the needs and indigent living in Jerusalem and all of Israel.

Human Services
8
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
9
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
10
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
11
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
12
University of Judaism Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BL GIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM INC: $33,320 · OtherBL GIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM INCIndividual grant recipient: $3,110 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAmerican Friends of CRIB Efrat Org: $2,000 · OtherRena's Place: $1,750 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,500 · Other+14 more: $2,191 · OtherZION ORPHANAGE INC: $27,475 · InternationalZION ORPHANAGE INC+7 more: $1,162 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIALA YESHIVA INC: $2,360 · ReligionMEVER LAYAM: $1,544 · ReligionJewish Content Inc: $680 · Religion+1 more: $54 · ReligionCONNECTICUT COUNCIL FOR PHILANTHROPY: $500 · PhilanthropyFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $216 · Philanthropy+1 more: $18 · PhilanthropyWildlife Conservation Society: $410 · AnimalsFriends of Yashar L'Chayal Inc: $200 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE INC: $180 · Human ServicesIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $18 · Human ServicesAmerican Museum of Natural History: $300 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $36 · Arts & Culture
Other$43,871International$28,637Religion$4,638Philanthropy$734Animals$410Human Services$398Arts & Culture$336

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBL GIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM INC: $33,320 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetZION ORPHANAGE INC: $27,475 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIALA YESHIVA INC: $2,360 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Content Inc: $680 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $558 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COUNCIL FOR PHILANTHROPY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $216 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Yashar L'Chayal Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC: $190 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOholei Yosef Yitzchok Lubavitch Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JORDAN RIVER VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUST ONE LIFE INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE ON ETHIOPIAN JEWRY INC: $54 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $36 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOODBRIDGE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED: $33 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundCombined Jewish Phila…The Ojc FundThe Tzedaka FundStephen and Regina Sa…The Slomo and Cindy S…The Zev and Susan Mun…Zichron Chaim Charity…Jewish Federation of …FjcMutual of America Fou…Raymond James Charita…
Jewish Communal FundNY23.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Tzedaka Fund · Stephen and Regina Savitsky Foundation · The Slomo and Cindy Silvian Foundation Inc · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Fjc · Mutual of America Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tiferet Rose Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tiferet Rose Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Connecticut Council for Philanthropy: 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tiferet Rose’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home