Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thurman Crawford Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.1M
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$2,900
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$54,500
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$33,983
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM$29,350
STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY$16,700
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$14,000
PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS$7,500
HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$7,500
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$4,450
TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY$4,250
LONE STAR COLLEGE KINGWOOD$4,200
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY$4,000
TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE$3,750
WEATHERFORD COLLEGE$3,750
HOUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $13k → 6%WEATHERFORD COLLEGE: $4k → 8%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $60k → 10%TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE: $4k → 11%PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $30k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 20%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $47k → 22%STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 23%SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 6%TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $55k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $8k → 14%PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $11k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $39k → 22%STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 23%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $55k → 10%TYLER JUNIOR COLLEGE: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $8k → 14%PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $4k → 16%TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $34k → 22%STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $31k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $4k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS: $4k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $18k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $15k → 10%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $15k → 22%AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $8k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM: $36k → 16%AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $4k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM: $29k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM: $17k → 16%HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%LONE STAR COLLEGE KINGWOOD: $16k → 16%LONE STAR COLLEGE KINGWOOD: $9k → 16%LONE STAR COLLEGE KINGWOOD: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$995k · 53 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
48

Total granted

$995k
$104k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+23%

Still filing today

13%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $14k · revenue +5%
  • HC
    HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +19%
  • SU
    Schreiner University
    4× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
2
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
3
Hardin-Simmons University

The mission of hardin-simmons university is to be a community dedicated to providing excellence in education enlightened by christian faith and values.

Education
4
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
5
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
6
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
Southwestern Christian University

Scu is a christ-centered liberal arts institution equipping students for a life of learning, leadership, and service; integrating faith, learning, and living; and empowering graduates to excel and to positively impact their world for jesus…

Education
9
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
University of the Southwest

University of the southwest is a christ-centered educational community dedicated to developing men and women for a lifetime of servant leadership by emphasizing faith, responsibility, and initiative.

Education
12
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of St Thomas; the most unlike its peers is Houston Community College Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $215,706 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $152,523 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $82,600 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,860 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY: $45,492 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $41,579 · Other+94 more: $473,117 · Other+94 moreHOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $13,500 · EducationSchreiner University: $9,152 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $7,552 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas: $6,500 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $2,000 · EducationLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,800 · Education+2 more: $3,052 · Education
Other$1,061,877Education$49,556

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $12,152 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSchreiner University: $9,152 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $7,552 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas: $1,552 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Schreiner University ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · The Callaway Foundation · The Robert A Welch Foundation · Texas Higher Education Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Leola W and Charles H Hugg Trust Xxxxx8007 · Charles & Lois Marie Bright Foundation · The Mclaughlin Doty Foundation · Glaser Family Charitable Foundation · Greater Texas Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thurman Crawford Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thurman Crawford Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thurman Crawford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph