Skip to content
Thrive Allen County Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Thrive Allen County Inc

To promote and support a safe and healthy environment for the residents of allen county, kansas by providing, sponsoring, facilitating, promoting, and supporting health care, educational and recreational services, and opportunities for such residents.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$189k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$1.3MHuman Services$630kCommunity Improvement$520kCivil Rights$334kFood & Nutrition$60kEducation$40kReligion$17k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $1,018,082, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,314,629 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $296,547 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $880k
$84,417
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS$188,686
LIBERAL AREA COALITION FOR FAMILIES$159,662
THRIVE KANSAS INC$150,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SEK$141,508
CLAY COUNTY GROWTH ALLIANCE INC$87,703
EL CENTRO INC$84,417
THRIVE KANSAS INC$67,683
BE ABLE INC$39,567
COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF$33,856
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWEST KAN$27,566
BARBER COUNTY UNITED INC$27,434
ALLEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $933k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS: $235k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWEST KAN: $59k → 12%BARBER COUNTY UNITED INC: $74k → 12%LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS: $202k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWEST KAN: $28k → 12%BARBER COUNTY UNITED INC: $60k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS: $47k → 16%LIVEWELL NORTHWEST KANSAS: $189k → 10%BARBER COUNTY UNITED INC: $27k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 13 repeat orgs$406k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$3.5M
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $228k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $980k · revenue +2%
  • LN
    Livewell Northwest Kansas Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $626k · revenue +10%
  • TI
    TRI-AGENCY INTERVENTION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $494k · revenue +25% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • KB
    KANSAS BREASTFEEDING COALITION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -54%
  • MV
    MARMATON VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • CP
    CENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2023 · $36k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
2
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
3
Pivotal Health & Wellness Inc

Provide healthcare services and resources to courtland kansas and the surrounding rural communities.

Health
4
Kansas Hospital Association

The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.

—
5
Health Ministries Clinic Inc

To promote and improve the quality of life by providing integrated healthcare services to the entire community in the name and spirit of Christ

Religion
6
Kansas Association of Local Health Departments

The organization is dedicated to strengthening local health departments for the purpose of improving and protecting the health of all kansans.

—
7
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
8
Atchison Community Health Clinic Inc

Atchison community health clinic exists to promote wellness by providing quality healthcare to all.

Health
9
Harper County Health Foundation

Support and promote overall health and wellness within the Harper County, Kansas, area and surrounding communities

Health
10
Kansas Coalition for Common Sense Inc

Providing innovative research, message guidance, communication training, communication expertise,and collaborative strategies to aligned organizations to grow their capacity and improve collaborationand coordination among partner groups in…

Civil Rights
11
Konza Prairie Community Health Center Inc

To provide affordable, quality, comprehensive primary and preventative medical, dental, and behavioral healthcare in geary, riley and dickinson county, kansas as well as in surrounding communities.

Health
12
High Plains Mental Health Center Endowment Association Inc

Ensure the availability of quality mental health services to consumers of high plains mental health center

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Charities of Southwest Kansas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC: $980,423 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INCCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY INC: $173,438 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF WYANDOTTE COUN…IMPACT Ulysses Inc: $108,589 · HealthIMPACT Ulysses IncMITCHELL COUNTY REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $73,846 · HealthSoutheast Kansas Mental Health Center: $69,079 · Health+2 more: $62,100 · HealthLivewell Northwest Kansas Inc: $625,685 · Human ServicesLivewell Northwest Kansas …BARBER COUNTY UNITED INC: $161,341 · Human ServicesBARBER COUNTY UNITED INCCatholic Charities of Southwest Kansas: $86,898 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Sout…URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS INC: $58,913 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS INCEL CENTRO INC: $319,003 · Community ImprovementEL CENTRO INCCLAY COUNTY GROWTH ALLIANCE INC: $307,742 · Community ImprovementCLAY COUNTY GROWTH ALLIA…THRIVE KANSAS INC: $217,683 · Community ImprovementTHRIVE KANSAS INCTRI-AGENCY INTERVENTION INC: $493,936 · Crime & LegalTRI-AGENCY INT…MARMATON VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $39,950 · OtherALLEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE: $10,000 · OtherSEK Multi-County Health Department: $10,000 · OtherKANSAS BREASTFEEDING COALITION INC: $59,919 · Food & NutritionBE ABLE INC: $57,000 · ReligionNORTHEAST KANSAS COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $6,652 · Philanthropy
Health$1,467,475Human Services$932,837Community Improvement$844,428Crime & Legal$493,936Other$59,950Food & Nutrition$59,919Religion$57,000Philanthropy$6,652

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC: $980,423 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLivewell Northwest Kansas Inc: $625,685 over 3y, 17% of budgetTRI-AGENCY INTERVENTION INC: $493,936 over 3y, 30% of budgetEL CENTRO INC: $319,003 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCLAY COUNTY GROWTH ALLIANCE INC: $307,742 over 3y, 28% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY INC: $173,438 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBARBER COUNTY UNITED INC: $161,341 over 3y, 22% of budgetIMPACT Ulysses Inc: $108,589 over 2y, 30% of budgetCatholic Charities of Southwest Kansas: $86,898 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMITCHELL COUNTY REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $73,846 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetSoutheast Kansas Mental Health Center: $69,079 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS BREASTFEEDING COALITION INC: $59,919 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS INC: $58,913 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetBE ABLE INC: $57,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCENTRAL PLAINS HEALTH CARE PARTNERSHIP INC: $35,761 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTURNER HOUSE CLINIC INC: $26,339 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST KANSAS COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $6,652 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kansas Health Foundat…The Reach Healthcare …Health Forward Founda…Sunflower Foundation …Kansas Association of…Amazonsmile Foundation
Kansas Health FoundationKS28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kansas Health Foundation · The Reach Healthcare Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thrive Allen County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thrive Allen County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thrive Allen County Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Thrive Allen County Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thrive Allen County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home