Skip to content

· Public charity

Thrift Shop of Fruita Inc

Operate a local thrift shop with all volunteers help and donate profits back to the community in the form of grants and scholarships to other local non-profits for education, social welfare and those underserved in the community

$185k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$124kHealth$88kFood & Nutrition$78kHuman Services$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kReligion$48kRecreation & Sports$47kAnimals$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $133,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $184,834 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $51,334 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $71k
$7,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$675k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRIME HEALTH(MARILLAC CLINIC0$25,000
MONUMENT VIEW BIBLE CHURCH$18,000
FRUITA MONUMENT HIGH SCHOOL$17,500
LOWER VALLEY FIRE DISTRICT$10,500
KIDS AID BACKPACK PROGRAM$7,300
GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH$7,200
MEALS ON WHEELS - MESA COUNTY$7,200
EUREKA MCCONNELL MATH & SCIENCE CENTER$7,200
HILLTOP COMMUNITY RESOURCES$6,600
FRUITA LITTLE LEAGUE$6,000
GRAND RIVER HUMANE SOCIETY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GRAND VALLEY EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING CENTER$5,000
GRAND MESA NORDIC COUNCIL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH: $7k → 11%GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH: $7k → 11%GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH: $7k → 11%GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$312k · 16 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
47

Total granted

$312k
$282k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

38%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARILLAC CLINIC INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $29k · revenue +56%
  • GV
    GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +30%
  • FA
    FRUITA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • LV
    LOWER VALLEY FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • MV
    MONUMENT VIEW CHURCH FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2024 · $18k
  • GV
    GRAND VALLEY EQUINE TRAINING CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grand Junction Economic Partnership

The mission of the grand junction economic partnership is to generate high quality economic development by attracting business and quality jobs to mesa county, colorado.

Community Improvement
2
Mesa County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect and enhance agricultural land, wildlife habitat and scenic lands in western colorado to benefit the community at large, enrich lives, and provide opportunities for outdoor recreation for future generations.

Environment
3
Grief Center of Southwest Colorado

Grief support to those who have lost a loved one.

Health
4
Homeward Bound of the Grand Valley

Provide assistance and services to homeless persons in the grand valley.

Housing & Shelter
5
Mesilla Valley Habitat for Humanity

We are the mesilla valley habitat for humanity (an affiliate of habitat for humanity international), serving the greater las cruces are in dona ana county, new mexico. we have given a hand up (rather than a hand out) to 88 new home owners…

Housing & Shelter
6
Mesilla Valley Community of Hope

Mesilla valley community of hope is a daytime service center for homeless people. it provides programs and intensive case management. it operates several housing programs to meet the people's emergency, transitional and permanent housing…

Human Services
7
Colorado Horse Rescue

Our mission is to build a better future for horses by continuously reimagining what's possible and creating a reality where safe solutions exist for every horse.

Animals
8
Christian Care Mesa Iii

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

Housing & Shelter
9
Midwestern Colorado Mental Health Center

Provide mental health services to residents of the center's catchment area, which is made up of six counties in western colorado.

—
10
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
11
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
12
Joseph Center

The Joseph Center was created to support families in the intersection of homelessness and parenting. Our mission is to provide hope, establish stability, encourage resourcefulness and confer a sense of belonging to the greater community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Valley Catholic Outreach Inc; the most unlike its peers is She Has a Name. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MESA COUNTY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 51: $59,252 · OtherMESA COUNTY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 51LOWER VALLEY FIRE DEPT: $39,682 · OtherLOWER VALLEY FIRE DEPTMEALS ON WHEELS MESA COUNTY: $28,800 · OtherPRIME HEALTH(MARILLAC CLINIC0: $25,000 · OtherFRUITA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $21,500 · OtherFAMILY HEALTH WEST: $20,000 · OtherKIDS AID BACKPACK PROGRAM: $19,900 · OtherKARIS INC: $19,800 · OtherMONUMENT VIEW CHURCH FOOD BANK: $18,400 · Other+52 more: $297,516 · Other+52 moreMARILLAC CLINIC INC: $29,000 · HealthHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $6,600 · HealthGRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $28,800 · Human ServicesGRAND RIVERS HUMANE SOCIETY: $18,500 · AnimalsGRAND VALLEY PETS ALIVE: $5,000 · AnimalsTWIN PEAKS BIBLE CAMP: $20,789 · Youth DevelopmentGRAND VALLEY EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING CENTER: $5,000 · EducationHOPE OF THE GRAND VALLEY: $3,600 · EducationShe Has A Name: $6,000 · ReligionCHRIST CENTER: $2,500 · Religion
Other$549,850Health$35,600Human Services$28,800Animals$23,500Youth Development$20,789Education$8,600Religion$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARILLAC CLINIC INC: $29,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $28,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFRUITA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $21,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTWIN PEAKS BIBLE CAMP: $20,789 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetKARIS INC: $19,800 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGRAND RIVERS HUMANE SOCIETY: $18,500 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF WESTERN COLORADO INC: $7,073 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $6,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShe Has A Name: $6,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGRAND MESA NORDIC COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHARMONY ACRES EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE OF THE GRAND VALLEY: $3,600 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHRIST CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARILLAC CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRUITA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds TWIN PEAKS BIBLE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds KARIS INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RIVERS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF WESTERN COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds She Has A Name ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Western Colorado Community Foundation IncCO30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · International Association of Lions 3602 · United Way of Mesa County Inc · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Goodwin Foundation · Bacon Family Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thrift Shop of Fruita Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thrift Shop of Fruita Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thrift Shop of Fruita Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Thrift Shop of Fruita Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thrift Shop of Fruita’s filings →

    More from the funding graph