Skip to content

· Private foundation

Three Graces Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.5M
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$3.9MEnvironment$383kArts & Culture$250kCivil Rights$225kHuman Services$133kFood & Nutrition$50kReligion$5kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $3,006,285, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,539,285 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $533,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $529k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.4M
$62,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Clear Fund d/b/a GiveWell$2,429,225
Clean Air Task Force$100,000
Coalition for Rainforest Nations$100,000
Asian Cine-Vision Inc.$100,000
Givedirectly, Inc.$66,667
IIBA Immigration Institute of Bay Area$62,500
Refed Inc.$50,000
Environmental Defense Fund Inc.$50,000
Center for Carbon Removal dba Carbon180$33,000
The United Way of Central Maryland$5,000
Daily Californian Education Fdn$5,000
Adventist Health International$4,893
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%See Attached: $3.5M → 14%See Attached: $2.3M → 15%See Attached: $1.9M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 5 repeat orgs$569k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$4.4M
$321k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+10%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
EnvironmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureSocial ScienceHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CLEAR FUND
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3.7M · revenue +31%
  • AC
    ASIAN CINE-VISION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $250k · revenue +109% · 95% of their budget
  • CA
    CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $200k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • IF
    INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $216k · revenue +10%
  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -77%
  • PC
    PUC Church
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CalCef Innovations

Optimizing the clean energy transition - 100%+ clean energy economy for the 100%.

Environment
2
Climate Imperative Foundation

Climate imperative foundation's mission is to employ science and economics to cut global carbon emissions to secure a better future for all.

Environment
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
6
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
7
California Clean Energy Fund

The california clean energy fund supports entrepreneurs to drive innovation and build equity into the clean economy.

Environment
8
The Energy Foundation

The energy foundation's mission is to achieve greenhouse gas emissions neutrality, world-class air quality, energy access, and green growth through transforming energy and optimizing economic structure.

—
9
Coalition for Green Capital D/B/a American Green Bank Consortium

Cgc operates as a nonprofit financial institution that invests directly and through partners to transform financial markets by using public and private investing to accelerate the deployment of projects that strengthen the grid, reduce…

Environment
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst Association Inc

The chartered alternative investment analyst association, inc. (caia) is a global professional credentialing body dedicated to creating greater alignment, transparency, and knowledge for all investors, with a specific emphasis on…

Community Improvement
12
Center for Global Development

Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refed Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Michael D and Margaret Ann Latta Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CLEAR FUND: $3,701,663 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $200,000 · EnvironmentCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT: $100,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $33,000 · EnvironmentASIAN CINE-VISION INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureINNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $215,884 · Social ScienceGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $133,334 · Human ServicesIIBA Immigration Institute of Bay Area: $125,000 · OtherREFED INC: $50,000 · Other+3 more: $14,893 · OtherASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC: $100,000 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$3,706,663Environment$383,000Arts & Culture$250,000Social Science$215,884Human Services$133,334Other$189,893Civil Rights$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $3,701,663 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetASIAN CINE-VISION INC: $250,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetINNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY ACTION A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $215,884 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $133,334 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFED INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL: $33,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDaily Californian Education Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAdventist Health International: $4,893 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Three Graces Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Three Graces Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Three Graces Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Three Graces Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.9M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Three Graces’ filings →

    More from the funding graph