Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas W Pangborn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$535k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$4.3MEducation$1.3MHealth$1.3MCrime & Legal$663kHuman Services$569kPhilanthropy$509kRecreation & Sports$284kYouth Development$182kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $518k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $302k
  • $250k+1 grant · $535k
$14,361
Median grant
9
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMORE$535,061
ISABEL DE LA PUENTEDIR PLN GIV$100,525
MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY$71,804
MERITUS MEDICAL CENTER$71,804
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC$57,443
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTO$46,550
LEAGUELITTLE FLOWERCNTRY SCHLS$43,082
TRUSTEES OF THE ENDOWMENT FUND$43,082
STELLA MARIS INC$35,902
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER$28,722
THE SCHOOL SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME$28,722
LOYOLA RETREAT HOUSE$28,722
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND INC$28,722
NATIONAL SOCIETY TO PREVENT$28,722
THE NATIONAL SHRINE OF THE$28,722
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $32k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $28k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $26k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $26k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $25k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $24k → 14%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IN
PA
MD
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.1M · 41 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
2

Total granted

$9.1M
$13k

Still filing today

37%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MERITUS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $474k · revenue +75%
  • MS
    MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $451k · revenue +25%
  • SM
    Stella Maris Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $237k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • KK
    KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • MO
    MARCH OF DIMES NATIONAL OFFICE
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
3
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
4
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
5
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
6
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
8
Mount Mary University Inc

Mount mary university, an urban catholic university for women sponsored by the school sisters of notre dame, provides an environment for the development of the whole person. the university encourages leadership, integrity, and a deep sense…

—
9
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stella Maris Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Lung Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMORE: $3,559,106 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMOREISABEL DE LA PUENTEDIR PLN GIV: $663,423 · OtherISABEL DE LA PUENTEDIR PLN GIVLEAGUELITTLE FLOWERCNTRY SCHLS: $284,323 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THE ENDOWMENT FUND: $284,323 · Other+29 more: $2,501,230 · Other+29 moreMERITUS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $473,875 · HealthMERITUS MEDI…Mercy Medical Center: $216,901 · HealthMercy Medica…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC: $207,379 · HealthLITTLE SISTE…American Heart Association Inc: $47,387 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $47,387 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $41,076 · HealthMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $451,254 · EducationMOUNT SAINT…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $379,100 · EducationUniversity …WASHINGTON COUNTY FREE LIBRARY: $94,774 · EducationWASHINGTON …LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $171,722 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $34,570 · Youth DevelopmentKENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC: $13,491 · Philanthropy
Other$7,292,405Health$1,034,005Education$925,128Human Services$171,722Youth Development$34,570Philanthropy$13,491

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERITUS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $473,875 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC: $451,254 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $379,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetStella Maris Inc: $236,937 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Medical Center: $216,901 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC: $207,379 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetLoyola University Maryland Inc: $206,151 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA RETREAT HOUSE: $172,952 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC: $171,722 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY FREE LIBRARY: $94,774 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $47,387 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $47,387 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $41,076 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMASON-DIXON COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $40,208 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $34,570 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC: $13,491 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERITUS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SAINT MARY'S UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Stella Maris Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds Loyola University Maryland Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA RETREAT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR OF WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds MASON-DIXON COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds KENNEDY KRIEGER FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John C Pangborn Item FifteenthPA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John C Pangborn Item Fifteenth · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas W Pangborn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas W Pangborn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Mount Saint Mary's University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Mercy Medical Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas W Pangborn’s filings →

More from the funding graph