Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas G and Nanette M St Peter Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$23kHuman Services$17kHousing & Shelter$17kEducation$15kHealth$13kInternational$9kYouth Development$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$650k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE$2,500
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,500
CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN$2,000
DETROIT RESCUE MISSION MINISTRY$2,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$2,000
CROSSROADS CARE CENTER$1,000
RIGHT TO LIFE LIFESPAN$1,000
MARY'S MANTLE$1,000
GLEANERS$1,000
ICU BIRTH CHOICE RESOURCE CENTER$1,000
UNBOUND$1,000
RIGHT TO LIFE OF MI ED FUND$1,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$1,000
GIANNA HOUSE$1,000
TUNNEL 2 TOWERS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $2k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%UNBOUND: $400 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122k · 28 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$122k
$2k

Still filing today

32%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +94%
  • U
    Unbound
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • KU
    KOFC UKRAINE SOLIDARITYFUND
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • AC
    AOD CATHOLIC SERVICES APPEAL
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • MP
    MARYMARTHA PROVINCE - VINCENTIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Global Hunger Project

The hunger project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. in 2025, it reached nearly 12.7 million people in over 10,000…

International
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
4
United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc

We unite people to create positive lasting change in our community.

Philanthropy
5
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
6
Project Milk Mission

Project milk mission is at the forefront of a vital mission - reducing infant mortality rates by championing breastfeeding, with a special focus on supporting low-income african american mothers. through comprehensive services spanning the…

Food & Nutrition
7
Covenant House Michigan

Covenant house michigan is a sanctuary for homeless and at-risk young people, ages 18-24 who have nowhere to go. it is our mission to serve these children with respect and love.covenant house michigan builds bridges to hope for young…

Human Services
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating a cure for each and every multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies,…

Health
10
Edward W Sparrow Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time.

Health
11
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Centers of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $12,150 · OtherCAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHENSALVATION ARMY: $10,755 · OtherSALVATION ARMYGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $9,850 · OtherGRACE CENTERS OF HOPEDETROIT RESCUE MISSION MINISTRY: $8,950 · OtherDETROIT RESCUE MISSION MINISTRYST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $7,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALRIGHT TO LIFE-LIFESPAN INC: $4,500 · OtherCROSSROADS CARE CENTER: $4,500 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY SCHOOL: $3,300 · OtherBIRTH CHOICE RESOURCE CENTER: $3,250 · Other+21 more: $26,450 · Other+21 moreGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $8,250 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMM…FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $7,000 · Food & NutritionFORGOTTEN HAR…Unbound: $9,500 · Human ServicesUnboundMARY'S MANTLE: $4,400 · Human ServicesMARY'S MANTL…Kettering University: $2,750 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $750 · EducationDETROIT DANCE COLLECTIVE: $2,755 · Arts & CultureBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · Health
Other$90,705Food & Nutrition$15,250Human Services$13,900Education$3,500Arts & Culture$2,755Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $9,850 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUnbound: $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $8,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $7,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S MANTLE: $4,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT DANCE COLLECTIVE: $2,755 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetKettering University: $2,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRACE CENTERS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S MANTLE ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT DANCE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds Kettering University ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas G and Nanette M St Peter Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas G and Nanette M St Peter Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas G and Nanette M St Peter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph