Skip to content
Thomas G & Nancy J Macrini Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Thomas G & Nancy J Macrini Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$6.0MReligion$3.3MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$320kFood & Nutrition$155k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $437k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.9M
$269,068
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL FDN$1,000,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON-IG$500,000
ST PETER CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$500,000
INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY$349,659
INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY$297,775
INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY$269,068
INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY$207,126
INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY$130,110
W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES$50,000
ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH$50,000
DENNIS HOLDER SCHOLARSHIP$30,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON$29,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOLY FAMILY PARISH: $200k → 14%DENNIS HOLDER SCHOLARSHIP: $30k → 16%CATHOLIC EXTENSION: $25k → 14%DENNIS HOLDER SCHOLARSHIP: $30k → 16%DENNIS HOLDER SCHOLARSHIP FD: $30k → 16%DENNIS HOLDER SCHOLARSHIP: $30k → 16%DENNIS HOLDER SCHOLARSHIP: $30k → 16%DENNIS HOLDER SCHOLARSHIP: $30k → 16%DENNIS HOLDER SCHOLARSHIP: $30k → 16%W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES: $50k → 16%W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES: $50k → 16%W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES: $50k → 16%W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES: $50k → 16%W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES: $50k → 16%W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES: $25k → 16%W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES: $25k → 16%W HOUSTON ASSIST MINISTRIES: $20k → 16%ST VINCENT DE PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $100k → 16%ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 16%ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 16%ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $40k → 16%ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25k → 16%ST MICHAEL CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20k → 16%CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $300k → 16%CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $250k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $1.2M → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $350k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $298k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $269k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $207k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $130k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $50k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $50k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $50k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $50k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $45k → 16%INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $35k → 16%ST PETER CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $500k → 16%ST PETER CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $500k → 16%ST THERESA CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $13k → 16%ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL FDN: $1.0M → 16%ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL: $500k → 16%ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 16%ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 16%ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 16%ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 16%ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 16%ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.6M · 14 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$9.6M
$336k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+299%

Still filing today

36%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +46%
  • WH
    WEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $320k · revenue +163%
  • NG
    Nora's Gift Foundation Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY PARISH
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • ST
    ST THERESA CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INCARNATE WORD ACADEMY: $2,783,479 · OtherINCARNATE WORD ACADEMYARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON: $1,647,600 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTONST PETER CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $1,000,000 · OtherST PETER CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL FDN: $1,000,000 · OtherST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL FDNST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL: $765,000 · OtherST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOLARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON-IG: $750,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON-IGCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $550,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLWEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC: $320,000 · Other+7 more: $548,050 · Other+7 moreCHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare: $1,210,000 · HealthCHRISTUS Fou…+1 more: $20,000 · HealthDennis W Holder Scholarship Fund: $210,000 · EducationCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICE INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesSETON EDUCATION PARTNERS: $12,500 · Philanthropy
Other$9,364,129Health$1,230,000Education$210,000Human Services$125,000Philanthropy$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare: $1,210,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetWEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC: $320,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetDennis W Holder Scholarship Fund: $210,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICE INC: $125,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetNora's Gift Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSETON EDUCATION PARTNERS: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare ↗
  • Who funds WEST HOUSTON ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Dennis W Holder Scholarship Fund ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Nora's Gift Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SETON EDUCATION PARTNERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Commu…Shell USA Company Fou…Charity Guild of Cath…Harry S & Isabel C Ca…Hildebrand FoundationScanlan FoundationMarek Family Foundati…Strake FoundationThe Lewis and Joan Lo…Albert & Ethel Herzst…National Philanthropi…The Blackbaud Giving …
Greater Houston Community FoundationTX20.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charity Guild of Catholic Women of Harris County Inc · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Hildebrand Foundation · Scanlan Foundation · Marek Family Foundation · Strake Foundation · The Lewis and Joan Lowenstein Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas G & Nancy J Macrini Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas G & Nancy J Macrini Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas G & Nancy J Macrini’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home