Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas & Martina Horn Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.0M
Granted FY2018
36
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2018 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k13 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $278k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.6M
$16,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL$500,000
BELLINGHAM FOOD BANK$400,000
LIGHTHOUSE MISSION$400,000
WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUDN$350,000
BELLINGHAN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$350,000
WHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIO$350,000
SALVATION ARMY$250,000
WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$75,000
MERIDIAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS$25,000
NOOKSACK VALLEY SCHOOLS$25,000
BLAINE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
BELLINGHAM DOLLARS FOR SCHOLLARS$21,000
UNITY CARE NORTHWEST$20,000
BELLINGHAM TECHNICAL COLLEGE$20,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $552k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $500k → 12%WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $20k → 12%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $12k → 12%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $12k → 12%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Whatcom Dispute Resolution Center

Provide and promote constructive and collaborative approaches to conflict resolution through mediation, training, facilitation, supervised visits and community education.

Unclassified
2
Northwest Counseling Service Inc

Housing Counseling Services

Housing & Shelter
3
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
4
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
5
Northwest Fair Housing Alliance

The mission of the Northwest Fair Housing Alliance is to eliminate housing discrimination and to ensure equal housing opportunity for the people of Washington State through education, counseling and advocacy.

Civil Rights
6
North West Housing Partnership

Through a fiscally responsible and multi-faceted approach, north west housing partnership nwhp promotes public and private partnerships that create and preserve cost-effective quality diverse housing for low to moderate-income residents…

—
7
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
8
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
9
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
10
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
11
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
12
Wasatch Homeless Health Care

Help homeless Utahns improve their health and quality of life by providing high-quality health care and support services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whatcom Council On Aging; the most unlike its peers is Love in the Name of Christ of Mason County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIGHTHOUSE MISSION: $400,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE MISSIONBELLINGHAN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $350,000 · OtherBELLINGHAN TECHNICAL COLLEGEWESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUDN: $350,000 · OtherWESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUDNSALVATION ARMY: $250,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY+19 more: $255,000 · Other+19 moreOPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $520,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY COUNCILWHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $12,000 · Human ServicesAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $400,000 · Food & NutritionAlternatives t…WHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $350,000 · EducationWHATCOM COMMUN…BLAINE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationBLAINE SCHOLAR…WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyUNITY CARE NORTHWEST: $20,000 · HealthLove in the Name of Christ of Mason County: $4,000 · Religion
Other$1,605,000Human Services$552,000Food & Nutrition$400,000Education$375,000Philanthropy$75,000Health$20,000Religion$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $520,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $400,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetWHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $350,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetWHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBLAINE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetUNITY CARE NORTHWEST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLYDIA PLACE: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEAN HUMPHREY HOUSE: $4,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLove in the Name of Christ of Mason County: $4,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITY CARE NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds LYDIA PLACE ↗
  • Who funds SEAN HUMPHREY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MAX HIGBEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Love in the Name of Christ of Mason County ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chuckanut Health FoundationWA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chuckanut Health Foundation · Mount Baker Foundation · Whatcom Community Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · First Fed Foundation · United Way of Whatcom County · The Dudley Foundation · Jerry H Walton Foundation · Mary H Storer Foundation · PeaceHealth · North Sound Accountable Community of Health

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas & Martina Horn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas & Martina Horn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas & Martina Horn Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas & Martina Horn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2019) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas & Martina Horn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph