Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas and Marina Purcell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$716k
Granted FY2022
10
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Thomas and Marina Purcell Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Thomas and Marina Purcell Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $716k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
19
16
20
12
21
7
22
0
23
1
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$3.8MEducation$1.2MArts & Culture$67kRecreation & Sports$43kScience & Tech$30kHealth$26kYouth Development$17kHuman Services$5kOther$1.7M
02FY2022 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DREAM$500,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$135,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$20,000
TEACHING MATTERS$15,000
THE GREEN HOUSE VENTURE$10,000
ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
POMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED$10,000
FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK$10,000
THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION$5,000
NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
MO
VA
NM
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 16 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$2.3M
$699k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+13%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +35%
  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $375k · revenue +19%
  • NR
    NATIONAL ROWING FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $43k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • WP
    WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -43%
  • TS
    TRINITY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • DI
    DMF Internationl Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -95%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York-Presbyterian Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Green House Venture. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%60%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $3,404,017 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $375,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION+1 more — $15,000 · PhilanthropyDREAM — $500,000 · OtherDREAMWEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC — $500,000 · OtherWEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRU…DREAM (FKA HARLEM RBI) — $275,000 · OtherDREAM (FKA HARLEM RBI)CONVENT OF SACRED HEART — $180,000 · OtherCONVENT OF SACRED HEARTTRINITY SCHOOL — $100,000 · OtherTRINITY SCHOOLHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL — $65,000 · Other+7 more — $138,500 · Other+7 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $1,135,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSI…+4 more — $76,000 · Education+4 moreTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $47,000 · Arts & CultureFoundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies — $15,000 · Arts & CultureSKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ROWING FOUNDATION INC — $42,500 · Recreation & SportsCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $30,000 · Science & TechMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $10,000 · HealthDEGREGORIO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · HealthThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc — $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL BLOOD CLOT ALLIANCE — $2,500 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $1,000 · Health
Philanthropy$3,794,017Other$1,758,500Education$1,211,000Arts & Culture$67,000Recreation & Sports$42,500Science & Tech$30,000Health$26,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $3,404,017 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $1,135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC — $500,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $375,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDMF Internationl Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $47,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ROWING FOUNDATION INC — $42,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUCKLEY SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEACHING MATTERS INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFoundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREEN HOUSE VENTURE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEGREGORIO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKOWHEGAN SCHOOL OF PAINTING AND SCULPTURE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BLOOD CLOT ALLIANCE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas and Marina Purcell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph