Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thomas and Elizabeth Brodhead Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$65kArts & Culture$28kFood & Nutrition$26kHousing & Shelter$25kHealth$15kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$10kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$951k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES$9,000
HAWAII FOOD BANK$9,000
THE PARISH OF ST CLEMENT$8,000
EPPING COMMUNITY CHURCH$7,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$5,000
CAMP MOKULEIA INC$5,000
MOILIILI HONGWANJI MISSION PROJECT DANA$4,000
HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$4,000
EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN HAWAII$3,000
BISHOP MUSEUM$3,000
HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART$3,000
PBS HAWAII$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION$2,000
HAWAII HEALTH & HARM REDUCTION CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE PARISH OF ST CLEMENT: $8k → 9%EPPING COMMUNITY CHURCH: $7k → 5%THE PARISH OF ST CLEMENT: $8k → 9%EPPING COMMUNITY CHURCH: $7k → 5%HONOLULU ACADEMY OF ART: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $3k → 9%INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $9k → 9%INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $8k → 9%BISHOP MUSEUM: $5k → 9%BISHOP MUSEUM: $3k → 9%HAWAII FOOD BANK: $9k → 9%HAWAII FOODBANK: $8k → 9%PBS HAWAII: $2k → 9%HAWAII PUBLIC TELEVISION: $2k → 9%EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN HAWAII: $3k → 9%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 9%MOILIILI HONGWANJI MISSION PROJECT DANA: $4k → 9%MOILIILI HONGWANJI MISSION: $3k → 9%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 9%CAMP MOKULEIA INC: $5k → 9%CAMP MOKULEIA INC: $2k → 9%HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN HAWAII: $3k → 9%HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%HAWAII HEALTH & HARM REDUCTION CENTER: $1k → 9%LIFE FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 14 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$228k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+40%

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’26
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HAWAII FOODBANK INC
    4× · 2021–2026 · $35k · revenue +12%
  • BM
    BISHOP MUSEUM
    4× · 2021–2026 · $18k · revenue +99%
  • HM
    HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART
    4× · 2021–2026 · $12k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • MH
    MOILIILI HONGWANGJI MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • LF
    LIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hawaii Book and Music Festival
Arts & Culture
2
Hui Pohala

Palliative care is a win-win-win-win. expanding access to palliative care benefits all parts of the healthcare system. people living with serious illness are better able to manage physical and emotional symptoms and have peace of mind that…

Health
3
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
4
Hoomau Ke Ola

Ho`omau ke ola provides comprehensive rehabilitation services including residential and outpatient care, treatment, and counseling to persons recovering from problems related to persons with mental and substance abuse disorders. ho`omau ke…

Health
5
Hawaii Maritime Center
—
6
Kalihi-Palama Health Center (Hale Ho'ola Hou)

To provide quality, integrated health and social services to our community and all others in need of health care.

—
7
Pacific Historic Parks

To support the national park service and hawaii's department of land and natural resources, through research, preservation, restoration, fund development, education, and interpretive programs of world war ii in the pacific and other…

—
8
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
9
Hawaii Education Institute
—
10
Hokah Area Food Shelf
Food & Nutrition
11
Hawaiian Islands Land Trust

Hawaiian islands land trust dba hawai'i land trust (hilt) is hawai'i's statewide land trust that is both a hawai'i 501(c)3 nonprofit, and a nationally accredited land trust. hilt's mission is to protect and steward the lands that sustain…

Environment
12
Hoa Aina O Makaha

Hoa aina o makaha (land of makaha shared in friendship) is more than a destination farm or nonprofit organization. the embrace of a sanctuary is felt by whoever enters the gates and a sense of belonging usually follows. once a barren piece…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Life Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Honolulu Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPPING COMMUNITY CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherEPPING COMMUNITY CHURCHTHE PARISH OF ST CLEMENT: $17,000 · OtherTHE PARISH OF ST CLEMENTSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $17,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENPARISH OF ST CLEMENTS INC: $16,000 · OtherPARISH OF ST CLEMENTS INCCAMP MOKULEIA: $15,000 · OtherCAMP MOKULEIAEPISCOPAL CHURCH IN HAWAII: $13,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH IN HAWAIIMOILIILI HONGWANJI MISSION: $6,500 · Other+6 more: $15,500 · Other+6 moreHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK…IHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $34,000 · Housing & ShelterIHS THE INSTITU…BISHOP MUSEUM: $18,000 · Arts & CultureBISHOP MUSEUMHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $12,000 · Arts & CultureHONOLULU MUSEU…HAWAII PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATION DBA PBS HAWAII: $2,000 · Arts & CultureHAWAII PUBLIC …HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationHAWAII HEALTH & HARM REDUCTION CENTER: $2,000 · Health
Other$130,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Housing & Shelter$34,000Arts & Culture$32,000Philanthropy$15,000Education$8,000Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC: $34,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBISHOP MUSEUM: $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII HEALTH & HARM REDUCTION CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds IHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BISHOP MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII HEALTH & HARM REDUCTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATION DBA PBS HAWAII ↗
  • Who funds LIFE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hawaii Foodbank IncHI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hawaii Foodbank Inc · Padosi Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas and Elizabeth Brodhead Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas and Elizabeth Brodhead Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas and Elizabeth Brodhead’s filings →

    More from the funding graph