· Public charity
Fair Count Inc
Fair count builds long-term power within historically undercounted communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $5,283,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,403,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $120,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $265k
- $250k+1 grant · $5.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEFENDING AMERICAN VALUES COALITION | $4,985,000 |
| SOULS TO THE POLLS WISCONSIN A PROJECT OF PASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY | $25,000 |
| MAKE THE ROAD STATES INC | $20,000 |
| DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA | $20,000 |
| LA BREGA Y FUERZA INC | $20,000 |
| GEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC | $20,000 |
| SOUTHERN RURAL BLACK WOMEN'S INITIATIVE FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL JUSTICE | $19,600 |
| SOUTHWEST GEORGIA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC | $17,000 |
| MIJENTE | $15,000 |
| THE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT | $13,500 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER COLUMBUS | $12,000 |
| WISDOM INC | $12,000 |
| SOWEGA RISING INC | $10,500 |
| ARONE M WASHINGTON FOUNDATION INC | $10,200 |
| LIFELINE BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITIZENSHIP3× · 2020–2023 · $250k · revenue -53%
- SRSouthern Rural Black Womens Initiative for Economic and Social Justice Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue -30%
- TLTHE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT2× · 2023–2024 · $64k · revenue -18%
Funded once
- IOINSTITUTE OF CHURCH ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $155k · revenue +152%
- GLGEORGIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS INC2× · 2021–2022 · $78k · revenue -59%
- UWUNITED WAY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INCone grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Transforming Georgia, Inc. is organized to make an indelible impact on the lives of Georgians through fighting for voting rights, supporting legislative solutions, programs and other proactive efforts to transform our communities.
The mission of the Southern Black Policy and Advocacy Network is to improve health outcomes and to reduce social and economic disparities impacting Black communities living in the U.S. South.
To ensure an equal voice to traditionally silenced communities across the South.
The mission of the collective renaissance guild is to educate, inform and train young leaders to build community and serve black communities and communities across the globe. we do this by elevating blac
Our goal is to increase power in our communities through effective voting. We increase voter registration and help develop voting infrastructure and to pursue policies that expands access to the ballot.
The mission of the collective renaissance guild is to educate, inform and train young leaders to build community and serve black communities and communities across the globe. we do this by elevating blac
Civic Engagement for the Haitian Community
To build a cross-class multi-racial progressive alliance, by combining integrated voter engagement, distributive organization, and sustained leadership development.
Empower people and strengthen democratic institutions
The Organization supports Latino-serving and Latino-led nonprofit organization and the Latinx community as a whole in Georgia. This support includes advocacy work, program development, technical assistance, grant making, and more. Our…
Women's March is committed to dismantling systems of oppression through nonviolent resistance and building inclusive structures guided by self-determination, dignity and respect.
Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwest Ga Project for Community Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sowega Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 10 years old; the field is 18. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 83% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Defending American Values Coalition ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITIZENSHIP ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF CHURCH ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Rural Black Womens Initiative for Economic and Social Justice Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TWIN FORKS RISING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION ↗
- Who funds THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Arone M Washington Foundation ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI M O V E ↗
- Who funds PASTORS UNITED COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDGAR & ANGELA SCOTT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds La Brega Y Fuerza Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds Democracy North Carolina ↗
- Who funds Make The Road States Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST GA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds WISDOM INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds Sowega Rising ↗
- Who funds Migrant Equity Southeast Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR INDIAN OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc ↗
- Who funds Hmong American Womens Association Inc ↗
- Who funds A Better Glynn Inc ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Echo Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc · New Venture Fund · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Windward Fund · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fair Count Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fair Count Inc?
Find your warmest path to Fair Count Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.