Skip to content

· Private foundation

Thelma Doelger Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$730k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$2.2MHealth$1.2MHuman Services$818kReligion$250kYouth Development$210kScience & Tech$210kFood & Nutrition$160kHousing & Shelter$95kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $370k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DR NORMAN SHUMWAY ENDOWED FAMILY OF FUNDS$145,000
MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY$75,000
SAN FRANCISCO SPCA$75,000
PENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY$75,000
ST ANTHONY'S FOUNDATION$40,000
MARINE MAMMAL CENTER$40,000
SAMARITAN HOUSE$30,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO$25,000
SUPPORTERS OF THE DOELGER SENIOR CENTER$25,000
CURI ODYSSEY (FORMERLY COYOTE POINT MUSEUM)$25,000
All May See Foundation$15,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY WILDLIFE LAND TRUST$10,000
SAN MATEO COUNTY HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Larkin Street Youth Services: $5k → 10%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 81% of Thelma Doelger Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 19%.

Thelma Doelger Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 35 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
3

Total granted

$5.3M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $525k · revenue +48%
  • MH
    MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $525k · revenue +67%
  • TM
    THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $230k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • TM
    That Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation
    one grant, 2025 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • LS
    Larkin Street Youth Services
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
2
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Bay Area Barns and Trails
Human Services
5
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
6
Transportation Alternatives for Marin
Public Benefit
7
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
8
Mental Health Association of San Francisco

The mission of the mental health association of san francisco is to cultivate peer leadership, build community, and advance social justice in mental health.

Health
9
San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
11
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
12
Sun Street Centers

To prevent alcohol and drug addiction by offering education, prevention and recovery to individuals and families, regardless of income level.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Zoological Society; the most unlike its peers is Parca Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DR NORMAN SHUMWAY ENDOWED FAMILY OF FUNDS: $915,000 · OtherDR NORMAN SHUMWAY ENDOWED FAMILY OF FUNDSPENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETY: $525,000 · OtherPENINSULA HUMANE SOCIETYSUPPORTERS OF THE DOELGER SENIOR CENTER: $465,000 · OtherSUPPORTERS OF THE DOELGER SENIOR CENTERST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherST ANTHONY FOUNDATIONSAMARITAN HOUSE: $200,000 · OtherSAMARITAN HOUSEMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $155,000 · Other+17 more: $707,500 · Other+17 moreTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $525,000 · AnimalsTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE P…MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $525,000 · AnimalsMARIN HUMANE SOCIETYSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $330,000 · AnimalsSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $230,000 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTERThe Humane Society Wildlife Land Trust: $70,000 · AnimalsCURIODYSSEY: $175,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $35,000 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $57,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMINAR: $35,000 · HealthThat Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation: $15,000 · HealthPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $35,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Youth Services: $5,000 · Human ServicesLandPaths: $35,000 · EnvironmentAlive and Free: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,217,500Animals$1,680,000Arts & Culture$210,000Youth Development$77,500Health$50,000Human Services$40,000Environment$35,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $525,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $525,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $330,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $230,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $200,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCURIODYSSEY: $175,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $155,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSan Mateo County Health Foundation: $70,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetThe Humane Society Wildlife Land Trust: $70,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetMID-PENINSULA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $70,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $57,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF DALY CITY: $52,500 over 7y, 53% of budgetCAMINAR: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLandPaths: $35,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetPACIFIC SKYLINE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $28,750 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAlive and Free: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThat Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CURIODYSSEY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
  • Who funds San Mateo County Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds The Humane Society Wildlife Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds MID-PENINSULA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF DALY CITY ↗
  • Who funds CAMINAR ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LandPaths ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC SKYLINE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Alive and Free ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds That Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bothin FoundationCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bothin Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Floyd Family Foundation · Hoefer Family Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thelma Doelger Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thelma Doelger Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thelma Doelger Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Thelma Doelger Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thelma Doelger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph