· Public charity
The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019)
Guided by our christian principles, we strengthen the spirit mind and body of all individuals.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k17 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+11 grants · $7.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit | $2,776,500 |
| YMCA of Greater Kalamazoo | $1,192,000 |
| Monroe Family YMCA | $769,910 |
| State Alliance of Michigan YMCAs | $724,144 |
| Ann Arbor YMCA | $483,395 |
| YMCA of Greater Michiana | $401,768 |
| YMCA of Greater Flint | $335,895 |
| YMCA of Metropolitan Lansing | $324,000 |
| YMCA of the Blue Water Area | $310,060 |
| Shiawassee Family YMCA | $301,344 |
| Northern Lights YMCA | $284,961 |
| YMCA of Saginaw | $231,275 |
| United Methodist Community House | $220,308 |
| YMCA of Greater Toledo | $199,550 |
| Jackson YMCA | $167,601 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $7.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KALAMAZOO2× · 2019–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +59%
- UMUNITED METHODIST COMMUNITY HOUSE2× · 2024–2025 · $446k · revenue +3%
- MYMUSKEGON YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION4× · 2017–2025 · $188k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- TRThe Refugee Education Centerone grant, 2024 · $215k · revenue 0%
- YOY-CENTER OF BATTLE CREEKone grant, 2019 · $33k · revenue -12%
- GRGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGEone grant, 2024 · $23k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Guided by our christian principles, we strengthen the spirit mind and body of all individuals.
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
The mission of the brainerd family ymca is to enhance the lives in the brainerd lakes area by connecting individuals and families with opportunities based on christian values that build a healthy spirit, mind, & body.
We build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities with a primary focus on youth activities and programs.
Our mission is to build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities. The YMCA of the Chippewa Valley is a community centered association dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all people, while maintaining an…
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.
The mission of the YMCA of Greater Cincinnati is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. Counting members and program participants, the Y reaches more than 114,000 people…
The mission of the lake county ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
Our mission is to put Judeo-Christian principles into practice though programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all. The YMCA of Greensboro is a volunteer-led public charity that includes men, women, and children of all ages,…
The y's programs focus on improving people's spiritual, intellectual, and physical well-being to support people as they actualize their fullest potential. the ymca serves community members of all abilities, ages, cultural backgrounds,…
Youth development and healthy living
The shasta family ymca strengthens community through programs and activities that create a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Assn - Tri-Cities Michigan and the most unlike its peers is The Refugee Education Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 61 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KALAMAZOO ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds State Alliance of Michigan YMCAs (0050) ↗
- Who funds Ann Arbor Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MICHIANA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of Lansing Michigan ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Greater Flint ↗
- Who funds Shiawassee Family YMCA ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLUE WATER AREA ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC-SAGINAW ↗
- Who funds BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Refugee Education Center ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo ↗
- Who funds MUSKEGON YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Cherry Street Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Jackson YMCA Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BARRY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DOW BAY AREA FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER MARINETTE-MENOMINEE YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds CADILLAC AREA YMCA ↗
- Who funds Sherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center ↗
- Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE BAY YMCA ↗
- Who funds STATE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI-CITIES MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds STEEPLETOWN NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DA BLODGETT - ST JOHN'S ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC CENTER OF WESTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MICHIANA INC ↗
- Who funds DAVID AND THU BRULE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF MARQUETTE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COREWELL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HOPE GARDENS ↗
- Who funds Y-CENTER OF BATTLE CREEK ↗
- Who funds HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds NEW CITY NEIGHBORS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Council of YMCAs of the USA · State Alliance of Michigan YMCAs (0050) · Consumers Energy Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Corewell Health Group Return · WK Kellogg Foundation · Feeding America West Michigan · Frey Foundation · Early Learning Neighborhood Collaborative · The Wege Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.