Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wyker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$32kArts & Culture$25kInternational$8kPhilanthropy$8kYouth Development$5kHousing & Shelter$2kHuman Services$1kEducation$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$212k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cook Museum$4,000
Rotary Foundation$3,250
NCC$2,800
Hur House$2,285
Nations of Coaches$1,000
Young Life Decatur Morgan$1,000
RUF$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
1ST Priority$600
Individual grant recipient$500
African Renewal Ministries$480
Rotary Dist 5840 Foundation$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Neighborhood Christian Center: $600 → 13%Neighborhood Christian Center: $600 → 13%Hospice of the Valley: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 11 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$60k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+16%

Still filing today

27%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    First Bible Church
    4× · 2020–2024 · $20k
  • CM
    Cook Museum
    3× · 2020–2025 · $17k
  • CM
    Cooks Museum
    2× · 2022–2023 · $8k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +27%
  • CC
    CANVAS CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
2
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
3
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

The corporation makes distributions to or for christian churches, ministries, and other charities

Philanthropy
4
Central Christian College of the Bible

Central christian college of the bible (central) exists to develop servant-leaders for the church. as a traditional undergraduate bible college of the restoration movement, central equips faithful men and women for leadership ministry.

Education
5
Antioch Baptist Church

Church/religious organization

—
6
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
7
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
8
Youth for Christusa Inc

Working together with the local church and other like minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus, who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for sharing the love of christ, and…

Youth Development
9
Overseas Campus Ministries Inc

To preach and propogate the gospel of jesus christ in the united states and throughout the world, to provide christian literature and training materials through various forms of media, and to offer christian leadership and discipleship…

Religion
10
Financial Planning Ministry

Financial planning ministry, inc. (fpm) is a not-for-profit organization devoted to assisting in the performance of the functions of christian churches by serving their financial needs.

Health
11
World Sports Inc

To encourage and stimulate national sports ministries in all countries

Recreation & Sports
12
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Hospice of the Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

First Bible Church: $20,400 · OtherFirst Bible ChurchCook Museum: $16,500 · OtherCook MuseumCooks Museum: $8,000 · OtherCooks MuseumTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER: $7,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATERCANVAS CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherCANVAS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherNCC: $3,550 · Other+20 more: $12,875 · Other+20 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $7,250 · InternationalTHE ROTARY…AFRICA RENEWAL MINISTRIES INC: $960 · InternationalAFRICA REN…YOUNG LIFE: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONS OF COACHES INC: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentSPORT X CHANGE INTERNATIONAL: $600 · Youth DevelopmentNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL: $1,200 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC: $100 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$77,325International$8,210Youth Development$4,100Human Services$1,300Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $7,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER: $7,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONS OF COACHES INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL: $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICA RENEWAL MINISTRIES INC: $960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPORT X CHANGE INTERNATIONAL: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONS OF COACHES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA RENEWAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SPORT X CHANGE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wyker Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wyker Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wyker Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph