Skip to content
The Womadix Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

The Womadix Fund

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Womadix Fund’s FY2021 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’19
1
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Philanthropy$13MCommunity Improvement$70kEducation$55kEnvironment$50kHuman Services$45kInternational$35kArts & Culture$30kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,187,315
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$1,187,315
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Water Protector Legal Collective

The water protector legal collective is an indigenous-led legal nonprofit that provides support and advocacy for indigenous peoples and original nations, the earth, and climate justice movements.

Crime & Legal
2
Bold Futures Nm

Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…

Human Services
3
Conservation Voters New Mexico Education Fund

Cvnm education fund is a statewide, nonpartisan nonprofit committed to engaging the people of new mexico in our long-standing shared values of protecting our air, land, water, and the health of our communities. we do this by mobilizing…

Civil Rights
4
Conservation Voters New Mexico

To hold elected officials accountable for their environmental votes and to educate voters on conservation issues.

—
5
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
6
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
7
Native Women Lead Inc

To revolutionize systems and inspire innovation by investing in native women in business. we do this by co-creating with and convening our community to build coalition while honoring our culture, creativity, and connections.

Community Improvement
8
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
Ndn Collective Inc

Build the collective power of indigenous peoples, communities, and nations to exercise our inherent right to self-determination, while fostering a world that is built on a foundation of justice and equity for all people and mother earth.

Community Improvement
11
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
12
Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico

The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Caravan to Class. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
17/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $12,437,305 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTWomen's Foundation of Minnesota: $565,856 · Philanthropy+2 more: $9,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Community ImprovementNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL: $70,200 · Community ImprovementDOROBO FUND: $90,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS: $35,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS: $30,000 · OtherTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST CREATIONS COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $12,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationMACALESTER COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationHONOR THE EARTH: $25,000 · EnvironmentDINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT: $10,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $10,000 · EnvironmentInternational Rivers Network: $5,000 · EnvironmentDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWise Fool New Mexico: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $20,000 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$13,012,661Community Improvement$220,200Other$187,500Education$55,000Environment$50,000Arts & Culture$30,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $12,437,305 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWomen's Foundation of Minnesota: $565,856 over 1y, 11% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL: $70,200 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetNEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS: $35,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMACALESTER COLLEGE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTHWEST CREATIONS COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWise Fool New Mexico: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rivers Network: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCaravan to Class: $4,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

WK Kellogg FoundationThe Schmidt Family Fo…Tides FoundationNew Mexico Community …Ms Foundation for Wom…Albuquerque Community…Novo FoundationSanta Fe Community Fo…Common Counsel Founda…Amalgamated Charitabl…ImpactassetsincSilicon Valley Commun…
WK Kellogg FoundationMI16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: WK Kellogg Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Tides Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Novo Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Womadix Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Womadix Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Womadix’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home