· Private foundation
The Witz Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k25 grants · $77k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $81k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Swedish Covenant Hospital Foundation | $25,000 |
| The Well Resource Center NFP | $21,000 |
| Bernie's Book Bank | $20,000 |
| United States Ski Team Foundation | $15,000 |
| American Heart Association Inc | $7,500 |
| Orchard Village | $7,000 |
| HCS Family Services | $7,000 |
| Lorenzo's house | $5,080 |
| Serbian American Medical Association SAMA INC | $5,000 |
| Lutheran Child and Family Services of Illinois | $5,000 |
| Hinsdale Hospital Foundation | $5,000 |
| Construction Industry Alliance for Suicide Prevention | $5,000 |
| Marine Raider Foundation | $4,000 |
| The Chicago Academy of Sciences | $2,500 |
| Little Hereoes League | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $287k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWThe Well Resource Center NFP8× · 2018–2025 · $122k · revenue +115%
- USUnited States Ski Team Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $105k · revenue +100%
- OVORCHARD VILLAGE9× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- AMADVENTIST MIDWEST HEALTHone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +9%
- BIBOX IT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -93%
- TFTurner Foundationone grant, 2017 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.
Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…
We, mercy health system of chicago and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy foundation is a member of mercy health system of chicago…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…
The hospital is a catholic health care organization sponsored by the sisters of st. casimir. by our commitment to witness to the healing mission of jesus, we contribute to healthy communities and promote quality health care to all with…
We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…
The mission shall be to provide fundraising, advocacy, and advisory support for cancer research at the comprehensive cancer center at the university of chicago.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crash and the most unlike its peers is Pat Mac's Pack Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Swedish Covenant Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Well Resource Center NFP ↗
- Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation ↗
- Who funds ORCHARD VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
- Who funds BERNIE'S BOOK BANK ↗
- Who funds SKENDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREENHOUSE SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds ACE MENTOR PROGRAM OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds HCS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ROBERT A REAUMOND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CONCERNS ASSOCIATI ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
- Who funds ADVENTIST MIDWEST HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DAISY DASH ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds THE MEND A HEART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ALLIANCE FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds BOX IT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds BROOKS STRONG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHICAGOLAND ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LORENZO'S HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SERBIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION SAMA INC ↗
- Who funds STRATEGIC ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds IBEW Local 134 Helping Hand Charitable Trust ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds THE SHALOM CENTRE OF AFRICA CO NUCOR CONSTRUCTION ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF IN/KY INC ↗
- Who funds HINSDALE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Skender Foundation · Executive Construction Foundation · Clune Cares Foundation Inc · Imc Chicago Charitable Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Turner Construction Company Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · The Dupage Community Foundation · Usg Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Witz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.