Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Wintercare Energy Fund Inc

The wintercare energy fund, inc.'s purposes are to aid the underprivileged residents of the commonwealth of kentucky to meet their need for energy and fuel for purposes of heating, cooking and lighting; to assist local community action agencies and others to identify and aid the residents of the commonwealth of kentucky who have fuel and…

$338k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$1.1MEducation$1.0MCommunity Improvement$321kEnvironment$134k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $313,439 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $338,067 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,628 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $176k
$20,659
Median grant
1
States reached
$540k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL FOR LEX-FAYETTE BOURB HARR NICH COUNTIES$111,382
BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC$64,692
KENTUCKY RIVER FOOTHILLS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC$30,567
NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC$24,954
NORTHERN KENTUCKY ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATION$20,659
PENNYRILE ALLIED COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$20,659
AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$10,943
CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC$7,528
MULTI-PURPOSE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC$7,509
TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC$7,446
GATEWAY COMMUNITY SERVICES$7,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $968k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 15%AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $11k → 13%BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $65k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $18k → 19%NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $42k → 20%LAKE CUMBERLAND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $10k → 20%LICKING VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $9k → 21%HARLAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $7k → 27%BELL-WHITLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $6k → 30%DANIEL BOONE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $8k → 35%AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $9k → 13%BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $65k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $17k → 19%NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $41k → 20%LAKE CUMBERLAND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $7k → 20%LICKING VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $9k → 21%BELL-WHITLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $6k → 30%DANIEL BOONE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $8k → 35%AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $8k → 13%BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $62k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $15k → 19%NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $28k → 20%LAKE CUMBERLAND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $7k → 20%LICKING VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $6k → 21%BELL-WHITLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $6k → 30%DANIEL BOONE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $6k → 35%AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $8k → 13%BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $51k → 14%Central Kentucky Community Action Council Inc: $14k → 19%NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $25k → 20%Bell-Whitley Community Action Agency Inc: $6k → 30%AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $8k → 13%BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $45k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $12k → 19%NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $20k → 20%AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7k → 13%BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $40k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $12k → 19%NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $18k → 20%AUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7k → 13%Blue Grass Community Partnership Inc: $40k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $11k → 19%NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $17k → 20%BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $39k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $8k → 19%Northeast Kentucky Community Action Agency Inc: $15k → 20%BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $23k → 14%CENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $7k → 19%NORTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $9k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 17 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$2.6M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
0%

Still filing today

94%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACT COUNCIL FOR LEX-FAY BOUR HARR AND NICH COUNTIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +115%
  • BG
    BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $428k · revenue +55%
  • NK
    NORTHEAST KY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • BS
    BIG SANDY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action of Southern Kentucky Inc

We team with Community partners to provide human services with dignity and respect, empowering people in Southern Kentucky to achieve stability and economic security.

2
Community Action Kentucky Inc

To advocate programs providing assistance to persons in low income environments to have adequate food, shelter, healthcare, education, water, waste and a sustainable home.

Community Improvement
3
Community Action Agency of Northwest Alabama Inc

Our mission is to reduce the causes and adverse consequences of poverty and to empower low-income individuals, families and communities to achieve self-sufficiency through advocacy, resource utilization and service delivery.

4
South Central Community Action Partnership Inc

To provide a wide range of services in an effort to help improve the quality of life for people with an economic disadvantage.

5
Ohio Heartland Community Action

Operate programs to assist low and moderate income individuals and families.

Human Services
6
Community Action Agency Inc

To aid low income families with early education, energy assistance, nutrition help and other services.

Human Services
7
Community Action Agency of Northeast Alabama Inc

To assist individuals at or below the poverty line by providing resources, funding, and education.

Human Services
8
Armstrong County Community Action Agency

Provide service and assistance to low income residents of armstrong county.

Human Services
9
Middle Kentucky Community Action Partnership Inc

To eliminate barriers, achieve economic security and empower families by partnering with other service providers.

10
Community Action Agency of Talladega Clay Randolph Calhoun & Cleburne Count

The community action agency of talladega, clay, randolph, calhoun, and cleburne counties is committed to reducing and/or eliminating the causes and consequences of poverty for families and communities through comprehensive educational and…

Community Improvement
11
Action for Eastern Montana

Action for eastern montana is committed to strengthening and enhancing the quality of life within the communities we serve by promoting education, advocacy and dignity for achieving independence.

Human Services
12
Tri-County Community Action Agency

To empower and create opportunities for vulnerable individuals and families in our community to become socially and economically self sufficient through integrated social, educational, health, prevention, and other basic services.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tri-County Community Action Agency Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pennyrile Allied Community Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $428,099 · Human ServicesBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INCNORTHEAST KY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $215,497 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST KY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $114,188 · Human ServicesCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INCAUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $64,687 · Human ServicesAUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INCMULTI-PURPOSE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $59,629 · Human ServicesMULTI-PURPOSE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCDANIEL BOONE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENC — $49,484 · Human ServicesLICKING VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM — $34,430 · Human Services+3 more — $61,563 · Human Services+3 moreCOMMUNITY ACT COUNCIL FOR LEX-FAY BOUR HARR AND NICH COUNTIES INC — $1,009,986 · EducationCOMMUNITY ACT COUNCIL FOR LEX-FAY BOUR HARR …KENTUCKY RIVER FOOTHILLS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC — $182,211 · Community ImprovementKENTUCKY RIVER…PENNYRILE ALLIED COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $115,623 · Community ImprovementPENNYRILE ALLI…GATEWAY COMMUNITY SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC — $23,261 · Community ImprovementGATEWAY COMMUN…NORTHERN KENTUCKY ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATION — $102,272 · OtherNORTHERN …TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $68,656 · OtherTRI-COUNT…Northern Kentucky Community Action Commission Inc — $31,551 · OtherNorthern …+1 more — $5,250 · Other
Human Services$1,027,577Education$1,009,986Community Improvement$321,095Other$207,729

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACT COUNCIL FOR LEX-FAY BOUR HARR AND NICH COUNTIES INC — $1,009,986 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $428,099 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHEAST KY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $215,497 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetKENTUCKY RIVER FOOTHILLS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC — $182,211 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPENNYRILE ALLIED COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $115,623 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $114,188 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $68,656 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetAUDUBON AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $64,687 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMULTI-PURPOSE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $59,629 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetDANIEL BOONE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENC — $49,484 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLICKING VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM — $34,430 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNorthern Kentucky Community Action Commission Inc — $31,551 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBELL-WHITLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $24,664 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE CUMBERLAND COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $23,986 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY COMMUNITY SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC — $23,261 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHARLAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $12,913 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG SANDY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC — $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels IncKY15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wintercare Energy Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph