Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Winkle Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$84kHealth$73kCommunity Improvement$65kHuman Services$58kEducation$45kHousing & Shelter$9kInternational$4kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$532k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEN CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION$23,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$15,000
LAKE CITY CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH$6,313
ALL BELONG$5,000
NORTHERN MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$2,500
LIFE RESOURCE MINISTRIES$1,000
CALVIN CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH$1,000
REVIVAL CENTER$500
LIFEWISE ACADEMY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($273k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($72k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%COMMUNITY HOPE: $5k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
MI
NV
SD
OH
NJ
CO
NE
MO
AZ
DC
FL

Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($72k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Dominican Republic$72k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 15 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
26

Total granted

$180k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+9%

Still filing today

53%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LUKE SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +52%
  • NM
    NORTHERN MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +3%
  • AB
    ALL BELONG
    5× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • SL
    SOCIEDAD LUCAS ONGINC
    one grant, 2023 · $62k
  • N
    NCF
    one grant, 2024 · $31k
  • CC
    CENTRO CHRISTIANA DE SALUD INTEGRAL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
4
Lifeway Mission International

Provide humanitarian aid and christian discipleship.

Human Services
5
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
6
Life Network

Life Network provides support and mentoring to women and men facing unexpected pregnancies; offers parenting support, material resources, and referrals; and promotes sexual risk avoidance through education to foster a culture that values…

Health
7
World Hope Ministries International

Training pastors, growing churches, and transforming communities for christ.

—
8
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
9
Homeword

Homeword seeks to advance the work of god in the world by educating, equipping, and encouraging parents and churches to build god-honoring families from generation to generation.

Youth Development
10
Lou Engle Ministries

Advancing the kingdom of god through prayer,preaching and teaching.

Religion
11
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
12
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifewise Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Canefire Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIEDAD LUCAS ONGINC: $62,470 · OtherSOCIEDAD LUCAS ONGINCFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $39,817 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYLAKE CITY REFORMED CHURCH: $31,454 · OtherLAKE CITY REFORMED CHURCHNCF: $31,000 · OtherNCFTHE LUKE SOCIETY INC: $29,500 · OtherTHE LUKE SOCIETY INCNORTHEN CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION: $23,000 · OtherNORTHEN CHRISTIAN FOUNDATIONLAKE CITY CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH: $11,413 · OtherCENTRO CHRISTIANA DE SALUD INTEGRAL: $10,000 · OtherEagle Village Inc: $10,000 · Other+22 more: $28,724 · Other+22 moreNORTHERN MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $21,865 · EducationNORTHERN MICHI…ALL BELONG: $18,550 · EducationALL BELONGLiving Stones Academy: $3,000 · EducationLiving Stones …+1 more: $100 · EducationLiferesource Ministries Inc: $4,000 · ReligionBIBLE BASICS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · ReligionEvery Man A Warrior Inc: $1,000 · ReligionCommunity Hope Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesTARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesNEW HOPE SHELTER: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $1,120 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY HOPE: $5,000 · Community ImprovementPROJECT CANEFIRE INC: $3,000 · International
Other$277,378Education$43,515Religion$6,000Human Services$5,500Housing & Shelter$5,120Community Improvement$5,000International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LUKE SOCIETY INC: $29,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHERN MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $21,865 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetALL BELONG: $18,550 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEagle Village Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Hope Inc: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiferesource Ministries Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetNEW HOPE SHELTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLiving Stones Academy: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT CANEFIRE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetRIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $1,120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE BASICS INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD ORPHANS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEvery Man A Warrior Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEWISE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LUKE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN MICHIGAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALL BELONG ↗
  • Who funds Eagle Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Community Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds Liferesource Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Living Stones Academy ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CANEFIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds RIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE BASICS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD ORPHANS ↗
  • Who funds TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Every Man A Warrior Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edgar and Elsa Prince FoundationMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Barnabas Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Marion & Marlene Betten Foundation · Stephen and Valerie Spoelhof Foundation · Cadillac Area Community Foundation · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Winkle Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Winkle Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 41%
  • Community Hope Inc: 41% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Winkle Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Winkle Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Winkle Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph