Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William V Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$450k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$10MHealth$3.6MRecreation & Sports$1.9MPhilanthropy$250kYouth Development$200kHuman Services$200kArts & Culture$150kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $650k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$100,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$450,000
GRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION$300,000
CPMC FOUNDATION$200,000
NATIONAL FOOTBALL FOUNDATION$100,000
TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION$100,000
OLD BLUE RUGBY FOUNDATION$100,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$50,000
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS FOUNDATION$50,000
ST ELIZABETH SETON SCHOOL$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MO
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 16 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$16M
$950k

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.3M · revenue +70%
  • TT
    THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $850k · revenue +117%
  • MS
    MENLO SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $600k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • UN
    US NAVAL ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • CA
    CMPC ALS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
  • CF
    CMPC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Stanbridge University Foundation
Education
7
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
10
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
11
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Us Naval Academy Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Old Blue Rugby Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $7,250,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 · Education+2 more: $300,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $1,395,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITYNATIONAL FOOTBALL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOOTBALL FOUNDATIONMENLO SCHOOL: $600,000 · OtherMENLO SCHOOLCPMC ALS FOUNDATION: $400,000 · OtherCPMC ALS FOUNDATIONCOLUMBIA MEN-WOMENS SPORTS: $400,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA MEN-WOMENS SPORTSIndividual grant recipient: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUS NAVAL ACADEMY: $200,000 · OtherCMPC ALS FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherCMPC FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Other+7 more: $550,000 · Other+7 moreGRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $1,950,000 · HealthGRACE SCIENCE …CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA PAC…THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $850,000 · PhilanthropyBest of the Batch Foundation: $200,000 · PhilanthropyOLD BLUE RUGBY FOUNDATION: $355,000 · Recreation & SportsSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Human ServicesMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $150,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$7,950,000Other$5,245,000Health$2,150,000Philanthropy$1,050,000Recreation & Sports$355,000Human Services$200,000Arts & Culture$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $7,250,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $1,950,000 over 7y, 36% of budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC: $850,000 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetMENLO SCHOOL: $600,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOLD BLUE RUGBY FOUNDATION: $355,000 over 4y, 75% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetBest of the Batch Foundation: $200,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetHartwick College: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MENLO SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD BLUE RUGBY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Best of the Batch Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Hartwick College ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William V Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William V Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The William V Campbell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The William V Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William V Campbell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph