Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William F Connell Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$404k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.4MHealth$834kRecreation & Sports$350kPhilanthropy$341kReligion$55kCommunity Improvement$28kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $900k
  • $250k+1 grant · $404k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL 1910 SH RICHEMONTCIE FIN$403,912
BOSTON COLLEGE- 2170 SH NETFLIX$205,217
BOSTON COLLEGE- 215 SH MASTERCARD INC$121,694
BOSTON COLLEGE- 1175 SH NETFLIX$111,120
ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL- 1180 SH NETFLIX$110,649
ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL- 177 SH MASTERCARD$100,885
ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL- 961 SH NETFLIX$90,113
BOSTON COLLEGE- 639 SH NETFLIX$60,430
DEXTER SOUTHFIELD ANNUAL FUND$50,000
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST$50,000
BOSTON COLLEGE FLYNN FUND$20,000
SCHOOL OF SAINTS FAITH HOPE AND CHARITY$10,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$7,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$6,000
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
IL
NY
MA
NV
CT
CA
VA
TN
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$675k · 18 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$675k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
0%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROCTOR ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +38%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +74%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL 1894 SH PERNOD RICARD
    one grant, 2024 · $267k
  • BC
    BOSTON COLLEGE STUDENT ATHLETE COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL- 356 SH MARTIN MARIETTA
    one grant, 2024 · $205k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
4
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
5
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
6
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
9
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Deerfield Academy; the most unlike its peers is Mount Auburn Community Fund Empowering Patient Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL 1910 SH RICHEMONTCIE FIN: $403,912 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL 1910 SH RICHEMONTCIE FINMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL 1894 SH PERNOD RICARD: $267,445 · OtherMASS GENERAL HOSPITAL 1894 SH PERNOD RICARDBOSTON COLLEGE STUDENT ATHLETE COMMUNITY: $250,000 · OtherBOSTON COLLEGE STUDENT ATHLETE COMMUNITYBOSTON COLLEGE- 2170 SH NETFLIX: $205,217 · OtherBOSTON COLLEGE- 2170 SH NETFLIXST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL- 356 SH MARTIN MARIETTA: $204,593 · OtherST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL- 356 SH MARTIN MARIETTADEXTER SOUTHFIELD ANNUAL FUND: $202,500 · OtherDEXTER SOUTHFIELD ANNUAL FUNDBOSTON COLLEGE- 215 SH MASTERCARD INC: $121,694 · OtherBOSTON COLLEGE FLYNN FUND: $120,000 · OtherMGH CONNELL FUND FOR PATIENT CARE RESEARCH SCHLR- 3013 SH COMCAST CORP: $115,699 · OtherBOSTON COLLEGE- 1175 SH NETFLIX: $111,120 · OtherST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL- 1180 SH NETFLIX: $110,649 · OtherST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL- 177 SH MASTERCARD: $100,885 · OtherBPS FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherBOSTON COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL- CO FATHER MONAN- 195 SH MARTIN MARIETTA: $97,984 · Other+15 more: $408,473 · Other+15 morePROCTOR ACADEMY: $49,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $32,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $31,000 · EducationHOLDERNESS SCHOOL: $8,100 · EducationVanderbilt University: $7,500 · Education+2 more: $3,500 · EducationMOUNT AUBURN COMMUNITY FUND EMPOWERING PATIENT CARE INC: $13,440 · HealthISLAND AUTISM GROUP INC: $1,000 · HealthBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $500 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE IBMA FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureEquestrian Connection NFP: $3,600 · Human Services
Other$2,820,171Education$131,600Health$14,940Youth Development$14,500Arts & Culture$12,500Human Services$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBPS FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY: $49,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $32,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC: $14,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IBMA FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetHOLDERNESS SCHOOL: $8,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEquestrian Connection NFP: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEX LIVINGSTON SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $1,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetISLAND AUTISM GROUP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT AUBURN COMMUNITY FUND EMPOWERING PATIENT CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE IBMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLDERNESS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds Equestrian Connection NFP ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALEX LIVINGSTON SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William F Connell Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William F Connell Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William F Connell’s filings →

More from the funding graph