· Private foundation
The William Chinnick Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $230k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| St Paul's Episcopal Church | $130,000 |
| Community Child Care Center of Delray Beach Founda | $100,000 |
| Saint Thomas Episcopal Church & School | $30,000 |
| Wood River Community Young Mens Christian Associat | $20,000 |
| Grace Episcopal Church | $15,000 |
| Wood River Land Trust Company | $15,000 |
| Sun Valley Summer Symphony Inc | $10,000 |
| CHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED INC | $10,000 |
| Harderwyk Ministries | $6,000 |
| Caridad Center Inc | $5,000 |
| TRACY HANSON INITIATIVE | $5,000 |
| Nicklaus Childrens Health Care Foundation Inc | $5,000 |
| BAPTIST HEALTH OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC | $5,000 |
| Crc Recovery Foundation Inc | $5,000 |
| Desert Scholarship Foundation | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Michigan3× · 2017–2019 · $300k · revenue +202% · 48% of their budget
- SCSigma Chi Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +32%
- SCSILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $52k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- SJST JOSEPHS EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $165k
ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +17%- HOHOSPITAL OF FOR SPECIAL SURGERY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Golf Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wood River Land Trust Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOLINC ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds SILVER CREEK ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds The Tracy Hanson Initiative ↗
- Who funds Wood River Community Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE MICHIGAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CRC RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Bethesda Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN LEAGUE FOR THE HANDICAPPED DBA INSPIRATION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds COREWELL HEALTH - MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ALLIANCE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD CLUBS ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health South Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC ↗
- Who funds DESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Nalen Foundation · Spur Community Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · The Oelman Foundation · Landmark Charitable Foundation Inc · Thrasher Koffey Foundation · Boswell Family Foundation · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The William Chinnick Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Children's Golf Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.