Skip to content

· Private foundation

The William and Kathryn Scripps Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$11MRecreation & Sports$325kEnvironment$100kArts & Culture$25kAnimals$15k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$399,999
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$399,999
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$399,999
U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$300,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%GLENDALE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $125k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $400k → 7%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $100k → 10%GLENDALE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $100k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $350k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%GLENDALE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $75k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $300k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $75k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $250k → 7%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $75k → 10%CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $60k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $150k → 7%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $533k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $533k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $70k → 7%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $450k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $300k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $233k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $200k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $150k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 8 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$13M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+6%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.7M · revenue +79%
  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +78%
  • GC
    Glendale College Foundation
    6× · 2017–2023 · $435k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • MM
    Maritime Museum Association of San Diego
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
2
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
3
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
Southwestern College Foundation

Southwestern College Foundation is dedicated to raising friends and funds that support all aspects of educational advancement at Southwestern College.

—
6
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
7
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
8
University of San Diego

The university of san diego is a contemporary catholic university, grounded in the liberal arts and anchored along an international border, advancing academic excellence to create a more inclusive, sustainable and hopeful world.

—
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
San Diego City College Foundation

Assist students to pursue education beyond secondary and high school level, provide scholarship funds to students, render varies services to san diego city college students and faculty, and generally operate in the advancement of education.

—
11
Cabrillo College Foundation

To provide private support for student scholarships, emergency financial support to increase student success, innovative mentoring, and support for youth to attend college and support for academic programs and facilities.

Education
12
Scripps College

To educate women to develop their intellect and talents through active participation in a community of scholars, so that as graduates they may contribute to society through public and private lives of leadership, service, integrity and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Maritime Museum Association of San Diego. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $7,728,328 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $3,659,999 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONGlendale College Foundation: $435,000 · Education+3 more: $420,000 · EducationMAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $435,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIE: $100,000 · OtherMaritime Museum Association of San Diego: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $14,500 · Animals
Education$12,243,327Other$535,000Arts & Culture$25,000Animals$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $7,728,328 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $3,659,999 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetGlendale College Foundation: $435,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetMAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $435,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetACCESS MAMMOTH: $325,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaritime Museum Association of San Diego: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTorrey Pines High School Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Glendale College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS MAMMOTH ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Maritime Museum Association of San Diego ↗
  • Who funds Torrey Pines High School Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The William and Kathryn Scripps Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The William and Kathryn Scripps Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William and Kathryn Scripps Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph