Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The William and Kathryn Scripps Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$667k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$11MRecreation & Sports$325kEnvironment$100kArts & Culture$25kAnimals$15k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $283k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$666,665
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$666,665
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$666,665
U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION$233,333
MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%GLENDALE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $125k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $400k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%GLENDALE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $100k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $350k → 7%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $100k → 10%GLENDALE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $75k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $300k → 7%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $75k → 10%GLENDALE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $250k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $75k → 10%CAMPANILE FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $60k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%DISABLED SPORTS EASTERN SIERRA: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $150k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $100k → 7%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $533k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $75k → 7%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $533k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $70k → 7%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $450k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $233k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $200k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $150k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%U C SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 8 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$12M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+6%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.9M · revenue +79%
  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +78%
  • GC
    Glendale College Foundation
    6× · 2017–2023 · $435k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • MM
    Maritime Museum Association of San Diego
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
2
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
3
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
Southwestern College Foundation

Southwestern College Foundation is dedicated to raising friends and funds that support all aspects of educational advancement at Southwestern College.

6
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
7
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
8
University of San Diego

The university of san diego is a contemporary catholic university, grounded in the liberal arts and anchored along an international border, advancing academic excellence to create a more inclusive, sustainable and hopeful world.

9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
San Diego City College Foundation

Assist students to pursue education beyond secondary and high school level, provide scholarship funds to students, render varies services to san diego city college students and faculty, and generally operate in the advancement of education.

11
Cabrillo College Foundation

To provide private support for student scholarships, emergency financial support to increase student success, innovative mentoring, and support for youth to attend college and support for academic programs and facilities.

Education
12
Scripps College

To educate women to develop their intellect and talents through active participation in a community of scholars, so that as graduates they may contribute to society through public and private lives of leadership, service, integrity and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Maritime Museum Association of San Diego. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $6,928,330 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $3,359,999 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATIONGlendale College Foundation — $435,000 · Education+3 more — $420,000 · EducationMAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION — $435,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIE — $100,000 · OtherMaritime Museum Association of San Diego — $25,000 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $14,500 · Animals
Education$11,143,329Other$535,000Arts & Culture$25,000Animals$14,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $6,928,330 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $3,359,999 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION — $435,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetGlendale College Foundation — $435,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetACCESS MAMMOTH — $325,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaritime Museum Association of San Diego — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTorrey Pines High School Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MAMMOTH LAKES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Glendale College Foundation
  • Who funds ACCESS MAMMOTH
  • Who funds THE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Maritime Museum Association of San Diego
  • Who funds Torrey Pines High School Foundation Inc
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The William and Kathryn Scripps Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph