Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Will and Jan Sukenik Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2023
31
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$1.2MHuman Services$953kHealth$683kArts & Culture$503kCommunity Improvement$383kHousing & Shelter$174kRecreation & Sports$128kFood & Nutrition$80kOther$0
02FY2023 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $875k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.6M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRMOUNT TEMPLE$1,000,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF CLEVELAND$765,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$500,000
GEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF MRDD$350,000
MENORAH PARK$100,000
AMERICAN ORT$100,000
HEBREW SHELTER HOME$100,000
MALTZ MUSEUM$100,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$75,000
THE DIVERSITY CENTER OF NE OHIO$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIV$50,000
HILLEL AT KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
THE NEGEV FOUNDATION$50,000
MINT THEATER COMPANY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $2k → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $20k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES: $15k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $50k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 17%MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CTR: $20k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CTR: $1k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 44 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
9

Total granted

$3.4M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+105%

Still filing today

32%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEGEV FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $80k · revenue +537%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $78k · revenue +40%
  • TG
    THE GATHERING PLACE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $65k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • I
    INMOTION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -37%
  • JN
    JEWISH NATIONAL FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
4
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
5
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
6
National Ramah Commission Inc

The national ramah commission (nrc) is the central coordinating, convening, and catalyzing body of the ramah camping movement. the nrc works with our movement's professional and lay leadership to preserve, strengthen, and build on the…

—
7
Partners in Torah

Offering jewish adults a personal connection to judaism,fostering a sense of belonging to the greater jewishcommunity, and building bridges between jews of allbackgrounds. to date, over 74,000 men and women from 39countries have been…

Religion
8
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati

The Jewish Federation of Cincinnati develops and connects leaders, contributors, organizations, and ideas to build an inclusive Jewish community that helps people in need, supports Israel, and assures a vibrant Jewish future.

Philanthropy
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
11
New Haven Jewish Community Council Housing Corporation D/B/a the Towers

We are a warm and vibrant senior community, infused with jewish values, where people live their best lives.

—
12
Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders

Medical research to learn about causes and possible cures for neurodegenerative disorders such as alzheimer and parkinson disorder.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAIRMOUNT TEMPLE: $1,000,000 · OtherFAIRMOUNT TEMPLEJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF CLEVELAND: $780,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF CLEVELANDCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $525,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONGEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF MRDD: $370,000 · OtherGEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF MRDDAMERICAN ORT: $135,000 · Other+36 more: $1,202,900 · Other+36 moreTHE GATHERING PLACE: $65,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $65,000 · Human ServicesThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $26,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesNORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $21,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION: $80,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $77,500 · International+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalMINT THEATER COMPANY INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $49,000 · Arts & CultureMILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES: $55,000 · HealthINMOTION: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthMAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES: $27,500 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC: $980 · Religion
Other$4,012,900Human Services$203,000International$160,000Arts & Culture$129,000Health$61,500Housing & Shelter$27,500Religion$980

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMINT THEATER COMPANY INC: $80,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $77,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE: $65,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $65,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES: $55,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $49,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKOL ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC: $28,800 over 7y, 10% of budgetMAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES: $27,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $26,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $21,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetINMOTION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S PALS: $5,000 over 5y, 38% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC: $980 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MINT THEATER COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEGEV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds KOL ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES ↗
  • Who funds The Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of ClevelandOH23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Cleveland Foundation · The Milton and Tamar Maltz Family Foundation · Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Foundation · The Albert B & Audrey G Ratner Family Foundation · The Joseph and Florence Mandel Family- Penni M and Stephen J Weinberg Family Fund · Richard Horvitz and Erica Hartman-Horvitz Foundation · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · The Peterman & Deminico Family Foundation Inc · The Miller Family Foundation · The Horowitz Ratner Family Foundation · David & Inez Myers Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Will and Jan Sukenik Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Will and Jan Sukenik Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Will and Jan Sukenik Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph