Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Will and Jan Sukenik Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2023
31
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of THE WILL AND JAN SUKENIK FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $875k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.6M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRMOUNT TEMPLE$1,000,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF CLEVELAND$765,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$500,000
GEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF MRDD$350,000
AMERICAN ORT$100,000
HEBREW SHELTER HOME$100,000
MENORAH PARK$100,000
MALTZ MUSEUM$100,000
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$75,000
MINT THEATER COMPANY$50,000
THE NEGEV FOUNDATION$50,000
THE GATHERING PLACE$50,000
HILLEL AT KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIV$50,000
THE DIVERSITY CENTER OF NE OHIO$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $203k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $2k → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION: $500 → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $20k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES: $15k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOM: $1k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $50k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 17%MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CTR: $20k → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CTR: $1k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%THE MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 44 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

44 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
9

Total granted

$3.4M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+105%

Still filing today

32%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureHousing & ShelterReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEGEV FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $80k · revenue +340%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $78k · revenue +40%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2017–2021 · $65k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • I
    INMOTION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -37%
  • JN
    JEWISH NATIONAL FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
4
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
5
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
6
National Ramah Commission Inc

The national ramah commission (nrc) is the central coordinating, convening, and catalyzing body of the ramah camping movement. the nrc works with our movement's professional and lay leadership to preserve, strengthen, and build on the…

7
Partners in Torah

Offering jewish adults a personal connection to judaism,fostering a sense of belonging to the greater jewishcommunity, and building bridges between jews of allbackgrounds. to date, over 74,000 men and women from 39countries have been…

Religion
8
Jewish Federation of Cincinnati

The Jewish Federation of Cincinnati develops and connects leaders, contributors, organizations, and ideas to build an inclusive Jewish community that helps people in need, supports Israel, and assures a vibrant Jewish future.

Philanthropy
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

11
New Haven Jewish Community Council Housing Corporation D/B/a the Towers

We are a warm and vibrant senior community, infused with jewish values, where people live their best lives.

12
Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders

Medical research to learn about causes and possible cures for neurodegenerative disorders such as alzheimer and parkinson disorder.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAIRMOUNT TEMPLE — $1,000,000 · OtherFAIRMOUNT TEMPLEJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF CLEVELAND — $780,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF CLEVELANDCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $525,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONGEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF MRDD — $370,000 · OtherGEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF MRDDAMERICAN ORT — $135,000 · Other+36 more — $1,202,900 · Other+36 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE GATHERING PLACE — $65,000 · Human ServicesThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland — $26,000 · Human ServicesNORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC — $21,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $21,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION — $80,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $77,500 · International+1 more — $2,500 · InternationalMINT THEATER COMPANY INC — $80,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $49,000 · Arts & CultureMILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES — $55,000 · HealthINMOTION — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $1,500 · HealthMAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES — $27,500 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC — $980 · Religion
Other$4,012,900Human Services$203,000International$160,000Arts & Culture$129,000Health$61,500Housing & Shelter$27,500Religion$980

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetMINT THEATER COMPANY INC — $80,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $77,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $65,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE — $65,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetMILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES — $55,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $49,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKOL ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC — $28,800 over 7y, 10% of budgetMAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES — $27,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland — $26,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC — $21,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINMOTION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION — $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S PALS — $5,000 over 5y, 38% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC — $980 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NEGEV FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MINT THEATER COMPANY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE
  • Who funds MILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds KOL ISRAEL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MAPLE LEAF COMMUNITY RESIDENCES
  • Who funds The Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland
  • Who funds NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of ClevelandOH23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Cleveland Foundation · The Milton and Tamar Maltz Family Foundation · Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Foundation · The Albert B & Audrey G Ratner Family Foundation · The Joseph and Florence Mandel Family- Penni M and Stephen J Weinberg Family Fund · Richard Horvitz and Erica Hartman-Horvitz Foundation · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · The Peterman & Deminico Family Foundation Inc · The Miller Family Foundation · The Horowitz Ratner Family Foundation · David & Inez Myers Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Will and Jan Sukenik Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph