· Private foundation
The Horowitz Ratner Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| J STREET EDUCATION FUND | $30,000 |
| PARK SYNAGOGUE | $25,000 |
| PRESENCING INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| PRESENCING INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $10,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA | $5,000 |
| PLAYHOUSE SQUARE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| PARK SYNAGOGUE | $5,000 |
| JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - JAFI | $5,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA | $3,750 |
| GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL | $3,750 |
| J STREET EDUCATION FUND | $2,630 |
| APOLLO'S FIRE THE CLEVELAND BAROQUE ORCHESTRA | $2,500 |
| GLOBAL CLEVELAND | $2,500 |
| ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 10% of The Horowitz Ratner Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMThe Musical Arts Association7× · 2017–2024 · $412k · revenue +45%
- JFJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL2× · 2017–2018 · $350k · revenue +51%
- PIPRESENCING INSTITUTE INC3× · 2023–2025 · $222k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- ASAGNON SCHOOLJOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JDSone grant, 2019 · $150k
- FOFRIENDS OF HORSESHOE LAKE INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -99%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIOone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.
The mission of fuchs mizrachi school is to educate each child in the orthodox jewish religious zionist tradition, imbued with the love of g-d, torah, people and the land of israel.
To further the charitable, educational and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland ("federation").
A leading advocate for pluralism and diversity, clal offers jewish wisdom that enhances public life, deepens civic engagement and cultivates personal growth.
Further the charitable, educational and religious purposes of the jewish federation of cleveland (federation).
Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.
The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.
The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cleveland Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Longboat Key Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds The Musical Arts Association ↗
- Who funds JOSEPH & FLORENCE MANDEL JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PRESENCING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BEZALEL ACADEMY OF ARTS AND DESIGNS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HORSESHOE LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds MILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN BOOKS LTD ↗
- Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Ohio Progressive Collaborative Education Fund ↗
- Who funds MEDISYS HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Playhouse Square Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE RATNER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds YASHRUT NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ARTS-INSPIRED LEARNING ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds GROSS SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO ↗
- Who funds HANNA PERKINS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: James and Susan Ratner Family Foundation · Ronald and Deborah Ratner Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Albert B & Audrey G Ratner Family Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The Esther and Hyman Rapport Philanthropic Trust · The Miller Family Foundation · Greenleaf Avenue Foundation · Marla & Joseph Shafran Foundation · Richard Horvitz and Erica Hartman-Horvitz Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Horowitz Ratner Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Presencing Institute Inc — 28% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Horowitz Ratner Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Horowitz Ratner Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.