· Private foundation
The Wetter Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DESERT FOOTHILLS LAND TRUST | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| FOOTHILLS CARING CORP | $5,000 |
| OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS | $5,000 |
| KLAMATH LAKE COUNTY FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| ST MARY'S SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| ACCESS BUILDING FUND | $5,000 |
| THE YMCA OF KLAMATH FALLS | $5,000 |
| KLAMATH ANIMAL SHELTER | $5,000 |
| BONANZA BOOSTER CLUB | $2,500 |
| FAMILY NURTURING CENTER | $2,500 |
| COMMUNITY WORKS | $2,500 |
| SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BUBASIN UNITED SOCCER CLUB INC3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +1%
- KKKLAMATH KID CENTER INC5× · 2017–2023 · $25k · revenue +95%
- WRWomen's Refuge of Vero Beach Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
- CHCLEVELAND HIGH SCHOOL WRESTLINGone grant, 2017 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Valley Residential Services provides personalized support in safe, comfortable home environments for developmentally disabled individuals, residences for veterans with rehabilitation opportunities, and family assistance services.
Valley Restart Shelter's mission is to support families, seniors, widows, children, and veterans on their path to permanent housing, and lasting stability-empowering them with hope and a renewed sense of pride.
The organization is committed to improving the lives of medically underserved persons by increasing access, reducing disparities, and eliminating barriers to healthcare.
Our mission is to love, house, and equip men, women and children. coming from chronic unemployment, recovery, or an endless cycle of homelessness, our residents experience a clean, safe home where transforming their life can begin.…
Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.
To provide affordable, quality living choices for seniors in a trusting environment.
Lifewell aims to provide hope and recovery through our person-centered residential, outpatient, housing and community living programs. we provide integrated healthcare services to low-income adults with behavioral and physical illness and…
Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.
Our mission is to eliminate substandard housing by partnering with low-income families living in substandard conditions. We are a Christian based, volunteer driven non profit housing ministry that is committed to eliminating poverty…
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
Inspiring hope, reuniting families, healing lives impacted by addiction.
American family housing provides a continuum of housing and an array of services to support homeless and low-income families and adults to secure a stable home, to be an active part of their community, and to achieve a self-sustaining way…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Works Inc and the most unlike its peers is Klamath Kid Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BASIN UNITED SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds KLAMATH KID CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE HERREN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DESERT FOOTHILLS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Women's Refuge of Vero Beach Inc ↗
- Who funds QUAIL VALLEY CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Senior Resource Association Inc ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 1N10 INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds EVERY DREAM HAS A PRICE INC ↗
- Who funds MINDS MATTER OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Wetter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Works Inc — 59% of income from government
- The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery — 38% of income from government
- Klamath Kid Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.