Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Wetsman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$913kPhilanthropy$290kHealth$260kEducation$42kScience & Tech$25kFood & Nutrition$17kHuman Services$11kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETROIT INSTITUE OF ARTS$10,200
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MID AND SOUTH MICHIGAN$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER HARTFORD$10,000
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION$5,000
JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK$5,000
THE MUSIC CENTER$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$5,000
MUSEUM TRUSTEE ASSOCIATION$4,500
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$1,500
UCLA FOUNDATION$1,500
HADASSAH$1,000
LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%JARC: $2k → 8%JARC: $2k → 8%JARC: $2k → 8%JARC: $2k → 8%JARC: $2k → 8%JARC: $2k → 8%JARC: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
OH
CT
CA
MD

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 37 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
17

Total granted

$1.4M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+15%

Still filing today

59%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $749k · revenue +46%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    6× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +202%
  • MT
    MUSEUM TRUSTEE ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CF
    CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • ML
    METAMORA LAND PRESERVATION ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -33%
  • WG
    WOMENS GUILD CEDARS-SINAI
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
2
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

4
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
5
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

6
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
12
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is The Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsPregnancy Support ServicesPublic University Foundatio…Community Health CentersClassical Music EnsemblesPublic Library SupportLgbtq+ Community CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support OrganizationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Animal Rescue and AdoptionLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr18%15%20–35yr11%27%35–55yr12%52%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr18%2%20–35yr11%18%35–55yr12%79%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
15%
13,165/88,878

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $749,098 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTSMUSEUM TRUSTEE ASSOCIATION — $46,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM TRUSTEE ASSOCIATION+8 more — $36,141 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DETROI — $145,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DETROIUniversity of Michigan — $125,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganTHE MUSIC CENTER — $75,000 · OtherTHE MUSIC CENTERPLANNED PARENTHOOD MID — $46,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD MID+33 more — $181,505 · Other+33 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $100,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $9,000 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $40,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $8,200 · HealthUCLA FOUNDATION — $29,675 · EducationTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $5,000 · EducationOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN — $3,500 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $25,000 · International+1 more — $200 · InternationalJARC — $14,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$831,239Other$572,505Philanthropy$109,000Health$48,200Education$39,175International$25,200Human Services$22,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $749,098 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $125,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM TRUSTEE ASSOCIATION — $46,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $29,675 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $17,832 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA — $16,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJARC — $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Family Service of Greater Hartford Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $8,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOLD NEWSBOYS GOODFELLOW FUND OF DETROIT MICHIGAN — $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMETAMORA LAND PRESERVATION ALLIANCE — $7,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK — $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCABARET 313 INC — $6,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTORM KING ART CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH ELLIS CENTER — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKADIMA — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GROUP — $3,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC — $1,405 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT OPERA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC — $789 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $520 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Historical Society — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT
  • Who funds MUSEUM TRUSTEE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds YAD EZRA
  • Who funds JARC
  • Who funds Jewish Family Service of Greater Hartford Inc
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OLD NEWSBOYS GOODFELLOW FUND OF DETROIT MICHIGAN
  • Who funds METAMORA LAND PRESERVATION ALLIANCE
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds CABARET 313 INC
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds STORM KING ART CENTER
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds RUTH ELLIS CENTER
  • Who funds OTIS COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN
  • Who funds KADIMA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ford PhilanthropyMI17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ford Philanthropy · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · The Gilbert Family Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Oliver Dewey Marcks Foundation · World Heritage Foundation · Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · Deroy Testamentary Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Wetsman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Wetsman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Wetsman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph