· Private foundation
The Weintraub Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $164k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE UNITED HATZALAH INC | $36,000 |
| THE OGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE | $35,000 |
| AMERICA-ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION | $23,000 |
| DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| CHILDRENS MUSEUM AND THEATRE OF MAINE | $10,000 |
| WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE | $10,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| HOMES FOR FAMILIES | $10,000 |
| THE TELEVISION ACADEMY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| KYLES FAMILY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CHARLES E MILLER FOUNDATION | $3,600 |
| MATTHEW SILVERMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| THE ROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +57%
- LALOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue ×63
- HFHOMES FOR FAMILIES6× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- LALOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +14%
- HBHAMMOND BLESSED 25THone grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue -13%
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The mission of lapf is to create partnerships to provide resources and programs that help the police perform at their highest level and to enhance lapd-community relations.(see schedule o)
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
Accelerate the discovery of drugs to prevent, treat and cure alzheimer's disease and related dementias.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America and the most unlike its peers is Charles E Miller Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds OGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mercy Hospital Northern Light Mercy Hospital ↗
- Who funds THE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM AND THEATRE OF MAINE ↗
- Who funds Kyles Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds River Tree Center for the Arts ↗
- Who funds George Lopez Foundation ↗
- Who funds HAMMOND BLESSED 25TH ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds THESENTRYORG INC ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Kennebunkport Conservation Trust ↗
- Who funds SCREEN ACTORS GUILD-AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS FOUND ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds BRICK STORE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARLES E MILLER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Johnny Carson Foundation · Pledgeling Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Toffey Family Charitable Trust · Tom and Kate Chappell Family Foundation · Virginia Hodgkins Somers Foundation Inc · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Onion Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Weintraub Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Heroes to Heroes Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Weintraub Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Weintraub Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.