· Private foundation
The Toffey Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k49 grants · $113k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $171k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $650k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST ANN'S CHURCH | $150,000 |
| WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| THE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF VERO BEACH | $100,000 |
| KBIA | $100,000 |
| VERO BEACH ROWING | $50,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| OVERLOOK FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC | $50,000 |
| SMITH AUTOMOTIVE GALLERY | $25,000 |
| INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST | $25,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING | $25,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC INDIAN RIVER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| TOMMY MCNAMARA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| EQUALITYMAINE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| REID R SACCO AYA CANCER FUND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
68 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $270k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OFOVERLOOK FOUNDATION2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +18%
- IRINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC6× · 2020–2025 · $76k · revenue +23%
- RTRIVERSIDE THEATRE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $39k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- NPNY Presbyterian Fundone grant, 2023 · $200k
- VBVERO BEACH COMMUNITY CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $150k
- AHAmerican Heart Association Incone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…
Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
To preserve and steward aquidneck island's open spaces for the lasting benefit of the community while connecting people with the land that defines the island's natural character.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The world molecular imaging society (wmis) is an international scientific educational organization dedicated to the understanding of biology and medicine through multimodal in vivo imaging of cellular and molecular events involved in…
To illuminate and advance greater understanding of and support for Wabanaki Nations' heritage, living cultures, and homelands.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian River Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ji Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds VERO BEACH ROWING INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds KENT PLACE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SMITH AUTOMOTIVE GALLERY ↗
- Who funds Indian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Summit Volunteer First Aid Squad Inc ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds KENNEBUNKPORT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EqualityMaine Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Indian River Community Foundation Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The William J J Gordon Family Foundation · The William W & Pamela C Lane Foundation · The Carwill Foundation · The Berghorst Foundation Inc · Archie S Wingfield Jr Charitable Trust U/A/D 5/15/1995 · Tom and Kate Chappell Family Foundation · The Bauman Family Foundation Inc · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Toffey Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Indian River Senior Center Inc — 71% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Learning Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
- Whole Family Health Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.