Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Watts Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$390k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$200k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Watts Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to President And Fellows Of Harvard College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Watts Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $390k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’18
11
’19
11
’20
11
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Science & Tech$8.4MEducation$883kHealth$321kReligion$220kPhilanthropy$52kArts & Culture$29kEnvironment$8kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k11 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $318k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND$200,000
HARVARD COLLEGE$117,629
ST CHRISTOPHER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$19,000
THAYER ACADEMY$10,000
ST CROIX FOUNDATION$10,000
THE CARROLL SCHOOL$10,000
UNITED WAY OF CAPE COD$3,000
WORLD OCEAN SCHOOL$3,000
WGBH$3,000
CHATHAM ORPHEUM THEATER$2,000
MONOMOY COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CAPE ABILITIES$2,000
ST CROIX ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION$2,000
CHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CAPE ABILITIES: $3k → 8%CAPE ABILITIES: $2k → 8%CAPE ABILITIES: $2k → 8%CAPE ABILITIES: $2k → 8%MONOMOY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 8%MONOMOY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 8%MONOMOY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%MONOMOY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 16 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$1.3M
$1k

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $201k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $112k · revenue +17%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $40k · revenue +46%
  • TC
    THE CARROLL SCHOOL
    4× · 2018–2021 · $40k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chatham Day School

Chatham day school celebrates and values each child as a unique learner with extraordinary potential. we offer an academically ambitious program that promotes intellectual achievement and emotional growth in a diverse and nuturing…

Education
2
Chatham County Economic Development Corporation

Building on the county's strategic location between the triad and triangle, edc is positioning chatham as the preferred location for emerging growth companies. the policy-driven approach focuses on targeted attraction, retention, and…

Community Improvement
3
Commission On Accreditation for Health Informatics and Info Mgmt Education

Cahiim's mission is to provide innovative leadership that drives enhanced workforce competence by ensuring educational excellence. cahiim serves the public interest in advancing the value of health informatics and health information…

Education
4
Cape Cod & Islands Association of Realtors Inc

The purpose of the cape cod & islands association of realtors, inc. ("cc&iaor") is to unite and serve those involved in the real estate industry in our region and work in concert with the massachusetts association of realtors and the…

—
5
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

—
6
Cape Henry Collegiate School Inc

We know, value, and challenge each student. we commit to building a diverse and inclusive community. we graduate independent thinkers and globally aware citizens.

Education
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Cape Ann Chamber of Commerce

Promotion of tourism on cape ann including the towns of rockport, gloucester, manchester, essex, and ipswich ma.

—
9
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
10
The Charles River School Inc

A pre-kindergarten through grade 8 independent school committed to academic excellence and the joy of childhood, fostering intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and the development of the whole child.

Education
11
Community Health Accreditation Program Inc

Advance the highest quality of home and community-based care.

Health
12
Cape Ann Museum Inc

To foster an appreciation of the quality and diversity of life on cape ann, past and present; to further the knowledge and enjoyment of cape ann history and art; to collect and preserve significant information and artifacts; and to…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Thayer Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chatham Ecumenical Council Helping Prevent Homelessness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $8,426,993 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College+3 more: $92,000 · EducationHARVARD COLLEGE: $790,542 · OtherHARVARD COLL…ST CHRISTOPHER'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $220,000 · OtherST CHRISTOPH…ST CROIX FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Other+5 more: $30,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $112,000 · HealthCAPE ABILITIES INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesMONOMOY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCHATHAM ECUMENICAL COUNCIL HELPING PREVENT HOMELESSNESS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCAPE AND ISLANDS UNITED WAY INC: $12,000 · PhilanthropyST CROIX ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · EnvironmentTHE CHATHAM ORPHEUM THEATER INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$8,518,993Other$1,080,542Health$312,000Human Services$19,000Philanthropy$12,000Environment$8,000Arts & Culture$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $8,426,993 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $112,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARROLL SCHOOL: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE AND ISLANDS UNITED WAY INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Ocean School Inc: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCAPE ABILITIES INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetST CROIX ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CHATHAM ORPHEUM THEATER INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMONOMOY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHATHAM ECUMENICAL COUNCIL HELPING PREVENT HOMELESSNESS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARROLL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CAPE AND ISLANDS UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds World Ocean School Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST CROIX ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHATHAM ORPHEUM THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds MONOMOY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATHAM ECUMENICAL COUNCIL HELPING PREVENT HOMELESSNESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bernard and Judy Cornwell Foundation IncMA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bernard and Judy Cornwell Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Weller Family Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Watts Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Watts Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Cape Abilities Inc: 81% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • World Ocean School Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Chatham Historical Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Watts Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph