Skip to content

California · Public charity

The Watershed Research & Training Center

To promote healthy communities and sustainable forests through research, education, training and economic development.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
35
Grants FY2025
28
Organizations funded FY2024
43%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$33,357
Largest grant, FY2025
$97,858
Organizations funded a year
13 to 28
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
12
Total assets, FY2025
$12M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 43% of the organizations The Watershed Research & Training Center funded were first-time grantees, receiving 37% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $445k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
EnvironmentEmploymentPhilanthropyArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving34$1.3M44%
FY202428$1.2M43%
FY202320$432k65%
FY202213$249kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Environment$1.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$469kPublic Benefit$429kEducation$342kArts & Culture$207kCivil Rights$124kPhilanthropy$108kCrime & Legal$99kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
OR
SD
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NM
NC
DC
HI
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Conservation Corps North Bay Inc$274,39431%
Plumas County Fire Safe Council Inc$158,38831%
Hawaii Wildfire Management Organization$156,219324%
The Forest Stewards Guild$145,34541%
Shasta Valley Resource Conservation District$141,5223n/a
Dovetail Partners Inc$140,79648%
Butte County Resource Conservation$126,5692n/a
University of California Davis$116,6752n/a
Tuolumne County Rcd$112,6963n/a
Southern California Mountains Foundation$107,69621%
Show all 53 grantees
All grantees of The Watershed Research & Training Center by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Conservation Corps North Bay Inc$274,39431%
Plumas County Fire Safe Council Inc$158,38831%
Hawaii Wildfire Management Organization$156,219324%
The Forest Stewards Guild$145,34541%
Shasta Valley Resource Conservation District$141,5223n/a
Dovetail Partners Inc$140,79648%
Butte County Resource Conservation$126,5692n/a
University of California Davis$116,6752n/a
Tuolumne County Rcd$112,6963n/a
Southern California Mountains Foundation$107,69621%
Ventura County Rcd$99,3383n/a
Round Valley Indian Tribes$95,3531n/a
Civicorps$91,91911%
Wildfire Adapted Partnership$88,671317%
Occidental Arts and Ecology Center$79,79831%
Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy$76,38210%
Regents of the University of Idaho$69,2052n/a
City of Ashland$66,2023n/a
Los Angeles Conservation Corps$65,92320%
North Carolina State University$57,3561n/a
California Indian Basketweavers Association$55,144220%
Nc State University$53,8971n/a
Tribal Eco Restoration Alliance$53,82921%
American Indian Council of Mariposa County$52,45523%
Plumas Corporation$48,85910%
La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians$46,4951n/a
Anderson Valley Community Services$46,2693n/a
Western Center Inc$44,9901n/a
Conservation Corps of Long Beach$37,62510%
Department of Public Health & Human Services$34,8203n/a
Boulder County$33,9531n/a
The Honey Lake Valley Resource Conservation District$29,1192n/a
Karuk Tribe$28,8321n/a
Seigler Springs Community Redevelopment Association$28,424218%
Salmon River Restoration Council$27,70412%
Scott River Watershed Council$26,8271n/a
Tahoe Resource Conservation Dist$26,2882n/a
Agricultural Research Service (Usda)$24,8591n/a
Cope Northern Sonoma County$22,90217%
California Open Lands$20,8001n/a
City of Flagstaff (N)$20,7903n/a
Pulaski County$20,0001n/a
Chestatee-Chattahoochee Resource Conservation and Development Council Inc$17,41922%
Chico State Enterprises$15,66310%
Cultural Fire Management Council$14,34912%
Placer County Rcd$13,2841n/a
City of Rapid City$12,5001n/a
Mid Klamath Watershed Council$11,5711n/a
Deschutes County$10,4621n/a
Island Park Sustainable Fire Commun$8,992113%
Eagle County Government$7,6001n/a
Chestateechattahoochee$7,5001n/a
Nj Fire Safety Council$5,3001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Watershed Research & Training Center supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConservation Corps North Bay Inc: $274,394 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPlumas County Fire Safe Council Inc: $158,388 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHawaii Wildfire Management Organization: $156,219 over 3y, 24% of budgetThe Forest Stewards Guild: $145,345 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetDovetail Partners Inc: $140,796 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetSouthern California Mountains Foundation: $107,696 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCivicorps: $91,919 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWildfire Adapted Partnership: $88,671 over 3y, 17% of budgetOccidental Arts and Ecology Center: $79,798 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGolden Gate National Parks Conservancy: $76,382 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLos Angeles Conservation Corps: $65,923 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia Indian Basketweavers Association: $55,144 over 2y, 20% of budgetTribal Eco Restoration Alliance: $53,829 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Indian Council of Mariposa County: $52,455 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPlumas Corporation: $48,859 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetConservation Corps of Long Beach: $37,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSeigler Springs Community Redevelopment Association: $28,424 over 2y, 18% of budgetSalmon River Restoration Council: $27,704 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCope Northern Sonoma County: $22,902 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetChestatee-Chattahoochee Resource Conservation and Development Council Inc: $17,419 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetChico State Enterprises: $15,663 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCultural Fire Management Council: $14,349 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetIsland Park Sustainable Fire Commun: $8,992 over 1y, 13% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Fish and Wildlife FoundationDC26.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Coalitions & Collaboratives Inc · Resources Legacy Fund · National Forest Foundation · The Nature Conservancy · Humboldt Area Foundation · The California Endowment · California Fire Safe Council Inc · California Fire Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Bella Vista Foundation · Bonneville Environmental Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Watershed Research & Training Center with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Watershed Research & Training Center?

Find your warmest path to The Watershed Research & Training Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Watershed Research & Training Center

How much does The Watershed Research & Training Center give?
The Watershed Research & Training Center reported 35 grants totaling $1,401,578 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 28 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does The Watershed Research & Training Center fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (37%), Public Safety & Disaster (14%), Public Benefit (13%).
Who are The Watershed Research & Training Center's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Conservation Corps North Bay Inc ($274k), Plumas County Fire Safe Council Inc ($158k), Hawaii Wildfire Management Organization ($156k).
Does The Watershed Research & Training Center fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 43% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Watershed Research & Training Center?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Coalitions & Collaboratives Inc, Resources Legacy Fund.
Where is The Watershed Research & Training Center based?
The Watershed Research & Training Center is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Watershed Research & Training Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph