Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Warren Westrate Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$50kHuman Services$6kAnimals$3kEducation$3kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$1kArts & Culture$475Recreation & Sports$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
3
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FELLOWSHIP REFORMED CHURCH$6,700
GATEWAY MISSION$500
REST HAVEN INC$300
SALVATION ARMY$250
CF FOUNDATION$250
CROP$200
POSITIVE OPTIONS$150
RCA KENYA PROGRAM SUPPORT$100
CAMP GENEVA$75
HOSPICE OF HOLLAND$50
COMMONS CHURCH$35
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $550) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $200 → 10%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $200 → 10%RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $100 → 10%HOSPICE OF HOLLAND: $50 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$71k · 14 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
14

Total granted

$71k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+397%

Still filing today

50%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $535 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • R
    Resthaven
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +78%
  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    3× · 2018–2021 · $2k · revenue +23%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $450 · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • HA
    HOPE ACADEMY OF SENIOR PROFESSIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • SH
    SALEM HIGH SCHOOL CROSS COUNTRY
    one grant, 2024 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Holland Community Hospital

To continuously improve the health of the communities we serve in the spirit of hope, compassion, respect and dignity.

Health
2
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
3
New Hope Christian College

New hope christian college exists to disciple emerging christian leaders by developing their theology, ministry skills, and character in order to win souls, plant fruitful churches, and lead as exemplary ambassadors for christ in the…

4
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corporation

Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…

Health
5
Hospice of Muskegon County Inc D/B/a Harbor Hospice

The mission of the organization is to provide end of life care, support and services to terminally ill patients and their families.

6
ContinueCare Hospital at Hendrick Medical Center Inc

It is the mission of continuecare hospital at hendrick medical center to deliver high quality healthcare emphasizing excellence and compassion consistent with the healing ministry of jesus christ.

Health
7
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
8
Rest Haven Illiana Christian Convalescent Home

Rest haven illiana christian convalescent home d/b/a providence life services (rest haven) is a not-for-profit illinois corporation whose purpose is to provide nursing and residential living arrangements for the aged including skilled…

Health
9
Fairhaven Christian Retirement Center

Fairhaven christian retirement center's mission is to provide a comfortable lifestyle and exceptional care which enhances quality of life in a manner that glorifies god. the center is designed and equipped specifically for the comfort,…

Housing & Shelter
10
Lake Forest Academy

Lake forest academy strives to embody in its practices - and to cultivate in its students -excellence of character, scholarship, citizenship, and responsibility.

Education
11
Hospice of Humboldt Inc

Offers a new hope for comfortable,peaceful and dignified end of life while focusing on patient's goals and wishes at all times.

Human Services
12
Hospice Homes of Genesee and Lapeer Counties

To provide housing and end of life care and support to terminally ill individuals.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Resthaven and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FELLOWSHIP REFORMED CHURCH — $49,005 · OtherFELLOWSHIP REFORMED CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $7,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $5,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAKESHORE RESCUE MISSIONS — $5,600 · OtherLAKESHORE RESCUE MISSIONSResthaven — $2,850 · Other+19 more — $5,105 · Other+19 moreHOPE COLLEGE — $2,100 · EducationCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $350 · HealthLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $350 · HealthHOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC — $450 · Human ServicesRENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $100 · Human ServicesHOLLAND MUSEUM — $425 · Arts & CultureBLUE LAKE FINE ARTS CAMP — $50 · Arts & CultureGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $400 · Religion
Other$75,460Education$2,100Health$700Human Services$550Arts & Culture$475Religion$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetResthaven — $2,850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE — $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLAND MUSEUM — $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER — $400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE LAKE FINE ARTS CAMP — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Resthaven
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF HOLLAND INC
  • Who funds HOLLAND MUSEUM
  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC
  • Who funds RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
  • Who funds BLUE LAKE FINE ARTS CAMP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Edward H & Diana H Marsilje Charitable Foundation · Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Marvin G & Jerene L Dewitt Family Foundation · De Witt Families Conduit Foundation · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Onequest Foundation · Barnabas Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Warren Westrate Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Warren Westrate Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Warren Westrate Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph