Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Walter S & Lucienne B Driskill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$612k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$293k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.5MHealth$3.5MYouth Development$1.3MHuman Services$256kArts & Culture$176kHousing & Shelter$106kPhilanthropy$54kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $219k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $293k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CURIOSITY 2 CREATE$293,241
SHEPHERDS COLLEGE$50,000
MASON S VOICE INC$50,000
YMCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$35,000
LITTLE FRIENDS INC$30,300
CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (PEGGY NOTEBEART NATURE MUSEUM)$30,000
BRIDGE COMMUNITIES$30,000
CHILD'S VOICE$28,333
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB CHICAGO$25,000
LEWIS UNIVERSITY$20,000
SPARKFORCE THE FMA FOUNDATION$10,000
ELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $399k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%MASON S VOICE INC: $50k → 14%MASON S VOICE INC: $25k → 14%TRICITY FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 8%YMCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $35k → 14%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $30k → 7%YMCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $20k → 14%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $30k → 7%YMCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $15k → 14%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $18k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $15k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $15k → 7%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $18k → 7%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $20k → 14%LITTLE FRIENDS: $15k → 7%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $18k → 14%LITTLE FRIENDS: $15k → 7%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $15k → 7%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10k → 14%LITTLE FRIENDS: $10k → 7%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 28 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
29

Total granted

$7.1M
$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+39%

Still filing today

64%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CREATIVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3.1M · revenue +23%
  • Northwestern University
    2× · 2017–2018 · $890k · revenue +41%
  • LF
    LITTLE FRIENDS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $148k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • OH
    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $1.4M
  • DF
    DRISKILL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $985k · 77% of their budget
  • AR
    ANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $303k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
2
Children's Museum of Oak Park

To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
5
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
6
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
7
Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare

Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
8
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
9
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
12
Children's Museum of Illinois

The operation of a children's museum.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Friends Inc; the most unlike its peers is Masons Voice Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $1,350,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYCURIOSITY 2 CREATE: $1,201,596 · OtherCURIOSITY 2 CREATEDRISKILL FOUNDATION: $985,050 · OtherDRISKILL FOUNDATIONLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $495,716 · OtherLURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $303,130 · OtherANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALCHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $210,000 · Other+34 more: $860,138 · Other+34 moreCREATIVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,065,205 · EducationCREATIVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $171,433 · EducationNorthwestern University: $889,500 · Recreation & SportsNorthwest…LITTLE FRIENDS INC: $148,300 · Human ServicesMASONS VOICE INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $70,000 · Human ServicesSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $67,500 · Human Services360 YOUTH SERVICES: $33,515 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesMAYO CLINIC: $327,500 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $125,000 · Housing & ShelterDUPAGE PADS INC: $7,510 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $3,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $62,000 · Arts & CultureDUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $29,000 · Arts & CultureELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureELMHURST ART MUSEUM: $14,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,405,630Education$3,236,638Recreation & Sports$889,500Human Services$399,315Health$332,500Housing & Shelter$136,010Arts & Culture$120,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCREATIVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $3,065,205 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetDRISKILL FOUNDATION: $985,050 over 1y, 77% of budgetNorthwestern University: $889,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $327,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $148,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $80,933 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetLewis University: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $77,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMASONS VOICE INC: $75,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $67,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $62,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHICAGO LIGHTS: $60,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $49,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budget360 YOUTH SERVICES: $33,515 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $29,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetELMHURST ART MUSEUM: $14,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEdward Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIAN PRAIRIE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDUPAGE PADS INC: $7,510 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cradle Society: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRICITY FAMILY SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRandom Acts of Flowers: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAK PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALIVE CENTER NFP: $3,425 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNaperville Education Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CREATIVE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DRISKILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Lewis University ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MASONS VOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO LIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds THE DUPAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 360 YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds DUPAGE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ELMHURST ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Edward Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN PRAIRIE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dupage Community FoundationIL25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dupage Community Foundation · Dunham Fund · Naperville Rotary Charities Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Tara Foundation · Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare · Exchange Club Charitable Organization · Neil & Ginny Gerald Family Foundation · Tellabs Foundation · Best Walter & Edith Foundation · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Walter S & Lucienne B Driskill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Walter S & Lucienne B Driskill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Walter S & Lucienne B Driskill Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Walter S & Lucienne B Driskill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walter S & Lucienne B Driskill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph