Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Walter and Judith Sleeth Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2018
51
Grants FY2018
9
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Walter and Judith Sleeth Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Silicon Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Walter and Judith Sleeth Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 30 organizations, $36k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

25
’17
30
’18
3
’19
0
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$647kArts & Culture$45kEducation$24kHealth$9kCivil Rights$5kEnvironment$4kHuman Services$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2018 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k50 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$200
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ART IN ACTION$13,350
HARVARD COLLEGE FUND$2,500
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$2,000
OBERLIN COLLEGE$2,000
JDRF$2,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$1,000
CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,000
LIFEMOVES$1,000
CORNELL LAW SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$1,000
CANTOR MUSEUM STANFORD$600
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$500
Individual grant recipient$500
MENLO ATHERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$500
CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHL$500
AVENIDAS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AVENIDAS: $2k → 8%AVENIDAS: $500 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $150 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
AR
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$81k · 35 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
18

Total granted

$81k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+48%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthEducationArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ART IN ACTION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $34k · revenue +14%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +49%
  • Oberlin College
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • OB
    OPERA BOX OFFICE
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • MA
    MENLO ATHERTON ED FDN
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • PV
    PACIFIC VALLEY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
10
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
11
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mongabay Org Corp; the most unlike its peers is Art in Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
34/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $646,940 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community FoundationART IN ACTION: $34,275 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $1,875 · Arts & CultureHARVARD COLLEGE FUND: $6,250 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $4,500 · OtherOPERA BOX OFFICE: $3,000 · OtherSF OPERA: $3,000 · OtherCORNELL LAW SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $2,500 · OtherLIFEMOVES: $2,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $1,700 · Other+38 more: $16,699 · OtherOberlin College: $4,000 · EducationCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,100 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $1,500 · EducationMENLO PARK-ATHERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 · Education+2 more: $550 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC: $1,200 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $700 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $400 · HealthSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $350 · Health+2 more: $400 · HealthAVENIDAS: $2,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $150 · Human ServicesAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $1,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 · InternationalGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA): $100 · International+1 more: $50 · International
Philanthropy$646,940Arts & Culture$36,150Other$39,649Education$13,150Health$7,050Human Services$2,650International$2,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $646,940 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART IN ACTION: $34,275 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAVENIDAS: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Bay: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWALKER ART CENTER: $625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENLO PARK-ATHERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAGAZZI BOYS CHORUS: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCabrillo College Foundation: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADOLESCENT COUNSELING SERVICES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA): $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmigos de las Americas: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ART IN ACTION ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds CASTILLEJA SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AVENIDAS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CRYSTAL SPRINGS UPLANDS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Bay ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MENLO PARK-ATHERTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA24.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Walter and Judith Sleeth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Walter and Judith Sleeth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Walter and Judith Sleeth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph